2013
DOI: 10.1002/ana.23898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal immune activation promotes hippocampal kindling epileptogenesis in mice

Abstract: Objective Maternal immune activation (MIA) triggered by infections, has been identified as a cause of autism in the offspring. Considering the involvement of perturbations in innate immunity in epilepsy, we examined whether MIA represents a risk factor for epilepsy as well. The role of specific MIA components– interleukin-6 and interleukin-1β was also addressed. Methods MIA was induced in C57BL/6 mice by polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid (PIC) injected during embryonic days 12–16. Beginning from postnatal day … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
74
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(73 reference statements)
9
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, these models highlight that synaptic elimination and envelopment of degenerating terminals can be a neuron autonomous event. Furthermore, our interpretation is also in line with other studies using the prenatal poly(I:C) administration model showing that significant neuronal and behavioral abnormalities can occur in the absence of overt microglia abnormalities (Garay et al, 2013;Missault et al, 2914;Pineda et al, 2013;Willi et al, 2013). Additional investigations will therefore be 25 needed to identify the cellular and molecular processes underlying the emergence of hippocampal synaptic deficits following prenatal immune challenge.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Instead, these models highlight that synaptic elimination and envelopment of degenerating terminals can be a neuron autonomous event. Furthermore, our interpretation is also in line with other studies using the prenatal poly(I:C) administration model showing that significant neuronal and behavioral abnormalities can occur in the absence of overt microglia abnormalities (Garay et al, 2013;Missault et al, 2914;Pineda et al, 2013;Willi et al, 2013). Additional investigations will therefore be 25 needed to identify the cellular and molecular processes underlying the emergence of hippocampal synaptic deficits following prenatal immune challenge.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Enhanced microglia activation in brain parenchyma, along with increased central production of secreted inflammatory factors, is often taken as a sign of ongoing inflammation in the CNS (48). The possibility that prenatal infection leads to chronic signs of brain inflammation has been supported only by some studies in rats and mice (17,69), whereas other rodent studies failed to find evidence for such neuroinflammatory processes extending into neonatal or adult life (5,43,96,119,151,157).…”
Section: Peripheral (And Central) Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it appears that more marked postnatal inflammatory changes are seen following relatively severe forms of maternal immune challenge, such as chronic exposure to immune system-activating agents throughout the entire gestational period (17). In contrast, acute or subchronic prenatal exposure to immune system-activating stimuli in mice and rats appears to be largely devoid of systemic and central inflammatory effects persisting into the juvenile or adult period (5,43,96,119,151,157). The latter may not seem surprising because inflammation is typically counteracted by homeostatic processes that mount antiinflammatory and/or immunosuppressive responses upon the induction of inflammation (132), which, in turn, dampen and finally resolve the post-acute fetal inflammatory responses to maternal immune activation (91).…”
Section: Peripheral (And Central) Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral testing was performed using the 3-chamber test [21], adapted by our laboratory [22], between 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM. The apparatus was a 60×40-cm Plexiglas box divided into 3 connected chambers (Noldus, Leesburg, VA, USA).…”
Section: Behavioral Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social novelty (second phase) was expressed as social novelty index and was calculated using a similar formula: [t new conspecific/ t new conspecific + t old conspecific ] × 100-50. On the resulting scale, the sociability and social novelty span from +50 (full preference for the conspecific during phase 1 and new conspecific during phase 2) to 0 (social indifference) to -50 (complete avoidance of the conspecific during phase 1 and of new conspecific during phase 2) [22][23][24]. Repetitive behavior was analyzed by calculating cumulative time spent grooming during each of the phases of the test and in each of the chambers of the apparatus.…”
Section: Analysis Of Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%