2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal immune activation alters sensitivity to action-outcome contingency in adult rat offspring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the immune activation took place at an earlier gestational day (GD12), the motivation for the food pellets under an amphetamine challenge was reduced in the absence of detectable disruptions in the dopaminergic system. Contrarily, the work by Millar and colleagues showed that Poly I:C administration at GD15 increased the motivation for food, possibly due to an inability to detect changes in the contingency between their behaviour and the resulting rewarding outcome (Millar et al, 2017). It must be noted that these experiments were performed using food pellets as reinforcers while we have examined the motivation for cocaine which may explain the differences in the results obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, when the immune activation took place at an earlier gestational day (GD12), the motivation for the food pellets under an amphetamine challenge was reduced in the absence of detectable disruptions in the dopaminergic system. Contrarily, the work by Millar and colleagues showed that Poly I:C administration at GD15 increased the motivation for food, possibly due to an inability to detect changes in the contingency between their behaviour and the resulting rewarding outcome (Millar et al, 2017). It must be noted that these experiments were performed using food pellets as reinforcers while we have examined the motivation for cocaine which may explain the differences in the results obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For example, the maternal immune activation model (wherein early developmental immune activation) of schizophrenia resulted in an elevated breakpoint in a progressive ratio breakpoint task. 50 This finding is in direct contrast with schizophrenia patients who exhibit reduced breakpoints, 25 but the authors maintained that the elevated breakpoint may have been related to an inability to detect changes in reward/behavior contingencies, leading to perseverative-like behaviors. 50 The increased breakpoint is similar, however, to our recent studies demonstrating that repeated phencyclidine treatment (a commonly used manipulation for modeling schizophrenia), also increased breakpoint in rats, even after a 2-week washout period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 This finding is in direct contrast with schizophrenia patients who exhibit reduced breakpoints, 25 but the authors maintained that the elevated breakpoint may have been related to an inability to detect changes in reward/behavior contingencies, leading to perseverative-like behaviors. 50 The increased breakpoint is similar, however, to our recent studies demonstrating that repeated phencyclidine treatment (a commonly used manipulation for modeling schizophrenia), also increased breakpoint in rats, even after a 2-week washout period. In contrast, isolation rearing-induced deficits Effort-based decision making is a critical component of negative symptoms in schizophrenia and can be readily assessed in humans and rodents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMDA receptor dysfunction has also been implicated as one outcome of maternal immune activation (MIA), a risk factor for the development of schizophrenia (Hao et al, 2019;Meyer et al, 2008aMeyer et al, , 2008b. MIA during the first and early second trimester has emerged as a significant etiological risk factor for the development of schizophrenia (Brown and Derkits, 2010;Khandaker et al, 2013;Patterson, 2009), and rodent models of MIA have shown a broad range of schizophrenia-relevant anatomical, neurochemical, and behavioral deficits (Boksa, 2010;Deane et al, 2017;Luchicchi et al, 2016;Meyer et al, 2005;Millar et al, 2017;Patterson, 2009), including NMDAR receptor hypofunction (Roenker et al, 2011). Because both MIA and ketamine influence NMDA receptor functioning and both manipulations are used to model schizophrenia, it raises the question of whether the MIA-induced changes in subjective state are similar to those induced by ketamine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%