Maternal History of Oceania from Complete mtDNA Genomes: Contrasting Ancient Diversity with Recent Homogenization Due to the Austronesian Expansion

Abstract

Archaeology, linguistics, and existing genetic studies indicate that Oceania was settled by two major waves of migration. The first migration took place approximately 40 thousand years ago and these migrants, Papuans, colonized much of Near Oceania. Approximately 3.5 thousand years ago, a second expansion of Austronesian-speakers arrived in Near Oceania and the descendants of these people spread to the far corners of the Pacific, colonizing Remote Oceania. To assess the female contribution of these two human expansions to modern populations and to investigate the potential impact of other migrations, we obtained 1,331 whole mitochondrial genome sequences from 34 populations spanning both Near and Remote Oceania. Our results quantify the magnitude of the Austronesian expansion and demonstrate the homogenizing effect of this expansion on almost all studied populations. With regards to Papuan influence, autochthonous haplogroups support the hypothesis of a long history in Near Oceania, with some lineages suggesting a time depth of 60 thousand years, and offer insight into historical interpopulation dynamics. Santa Cruz, a population located in Remote Oceania, is an anomaly with extreme frequencies of autochthonous haplogroups of Near Oceanian origin; simulations to investigate whether this might reflect a pre-Austronesian versus Austronesian settlement of the island failed to provide unequivocal support for either scenario.

Bridging two scholarly islands enriches both: COI DNA barcodes for species identification versus human mitochondrial variation for the study of migrations and pathologies

“…(2012)910413 European, 313 African, 184 N AmericanDuggan et al. (2014)795795 OceanianTanaka et al. (2004)672672 JapaneseChandrasekar et al.…”

Mass Migration and the Polynesian Settlement of New Zealand

“…This clearly indicates that these individuals were not full siblings or the descendants of female siblings. While our understanding of the level of mtDNA diversity in Pacific populations is changing rapidly with increased sampling in the regions (Duggan et al 2014), such levels of diversity in a founding population indicate that this was not a small, closely related matrilineal or matrilocal colonising group sampled from a single village or even a single island; if the individuals buried at Wairau Bar were not the very first generation of colonists, then the likely founding female population could have been even larger-all data that support a mass migration scenario.…”

Early Lapita skeletons from Vanuatu show Polynesian craniofacial shape: Implications for Remote Oceanic settlement and Lapita origins

“…This pattern suggests separate origins for the indigenous inhabitants of these two regions. Evidence from inherited genetic markers indicates that the populations living today in Vanuatu and generally in the region first settled by Lapita groups share a common origin in an area that encompasses Island South East Asia, the north coast of New Guinea, and the Bismarck Archipelago (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). These populations display haplogroups attributed both to the Pleistocene settlement of the northern Melanesian/Near Oceanic region and to the Lapita diaspora, with chronological estimates based on genetic data.…”