2016
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal exposure to carbon monoxide and fine particulate matter during pregnancy in an urban Tanzanian cohort

Abstract: Low birth weight contributes to as many as 60% of all neonatal deaths; exposure during pregnancy to household air pollution has been implicated as a risk factor. Between 2011 and 2013, we measured personal exposures to carbon monoxide (CO) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in 239 pregnant women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. CO and PM2.5 exposures during pregnancy were moderately high (geometric means 2.0 ppm and 40.5 μg/m3); 87% of PM2.5 measurements exceeded WHO air quality guidelines Median and high (75th ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indoor fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) levels generated by household characteristics, indoor activities, and outdoor sources have been reported to play a significant role in the indoor air quality . Exposure to elevated PM 2.5 levels has been shown to have a substantial role in respiratory and cardiovascular health, and pregnancy outcomes …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indoor fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) levels generated by household characteristics, indoor activities, and outdoor sources have been reported to play a significant role in the indoor air quality . Exposure to elevated PM 2.5 levels has been shown to have a substantial role in respiratory and cardiovascular health, and pregnancy outcomes …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-3 Exposure to elevated PM 2.5 levels has been shown to have a substantial role in respiratory and cardiovascular health, and pregnancy outcomes. [4][5][6][7] The quantification of an individual's exposure to indoor air pollutants for epidemiological purposes is achieved using personal and static environmental monitoring, which are generally time-consuming, complex, and costly. 8,9 This is exacerbated in resource-constrained settings, where access to multiple samplers, laboratories, and skilled technical staff is not readily available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rural area charcoal recorded the highest mean PM2.5 concentrations of 319.89 (SD±170.4)μg/m 3 followed by wood which had 314 (SD±182.5)μg/m 3 while electricity only recorded 182.5 (SD±150) μg/m 3 . In the urban area households using charcoal had 299.1 (SD+ 166.4) μg/m 3 , wood 249.82 (SD±170.5)μg/m 3 while electricity had 266.33 (SD±149.3)μg/m 3 . The highest VOCs concentrations level was 380ppb and measured in households using biomass fuels for cooking.…”
Section: Mean Differencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Household air pollution (HAP) is currently the leading environmental risk factor for global burden of disease [1]. Evidence exists of an association between exposure to elevated indoor air pollution levels and adverse health outcomes [2,3]. Exposure to indoor air pollution has been shown to have a substantial role in respiratory diseases, cardiovascular ill health, cataract and adverse pregnancy outcomes [4,5,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, dust was noted as a trigger for allergic rhinitis (Adegbiji et al, 2018) and house dust/dust mite exposure was associated with asthma (Bardei et al, 2016;Flatin et al, 2018). Particulate matter was evaluated in 24 of the indoor air pollution research studies, most focusing on PM10 (Abou-Khadra, 2013;Ibhafidon et al, 2014;Makamure et al, 2016;Jafta et al, 2017;Nkhama et al, 2017;Nkosi et al, 2017;Mentz et al, 2018) and PM2.5 exposures (Oluwole et al, 2013;Chafe et al, 2014;Ibhafidon et al, 2014;Dutta et al, 2017;Lacey et al, 2017;Lin et al, 2017a;Malley et al, 2017;Nkhama et al, 2017;Wylie et al, 2017a;Wylie et al, 2017b;Mentz et al, 2018). Some studies also measured NO, NO2, SO2, CO, and O3 (Jafta et al, 2017;Wylie et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Exposures Measuredmentioning
confidence: 99%