Maternal Effects in Mammals 2009
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226501222.003.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal Effects in Wild Ungulates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Maternal effects in mammals are well described from a variance components perspective in both captive (Rutledge et al 1972;Wilson and Reale 2006) and natural populations (Wilson et al 2005;Mcadam 2009;Wilson and Festa-Bianchet 2009). These studies have shown that they are often one of the largest components of variation for traits expressed early in life, with effects generally eroding after weaning (see Wilson and Festa-Bianchet 2009 for a review of persistence), but often persisting at a low level into adulthood (e.g., Riska et al 1984Riska et al , 1985Cowley et al 1989;Jarvis et al 2005;Casellas et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maternal effects in mammals are well described from a variance components perspective in both captive (Rutledge et al 1972;Wilson and Reale 2006) and natural populations (Wilson et al 2005;Mcadam 2009;Wilson and Festa-Bianchet 2009). These studies have shown that they are often one of the largest components of variation for traits expressed early in life, with effects generally eroding after weaning (see Wilson and Festa-Bianchet 2009 for a review of persistence), but often persisting at a low level into adulthood (e.g., Riska et al 1984Riska et al , 1985Cowley et al 1989;Jarvis et al 2005;Casellas et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have shown that they are often one of the largest components of variation for traits expressed early in life, with effects generally eroding after weaning (see Wilson and Festa-Bianchet 2009 for a review of persistence), but often persisting at a low level into adulthood (e.g., Riska et al 1984Riska et al , 1985Cowley et al 1989;Jarvis et al 2005;Casellas et al 2009). It is important to keep in mind that most of our understanding of maternal effects has come from studies that used approaches that cannot differentiate between genetic-and environmentally based maternal effects (but exceptions exist; e.g., Wilson …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During periods of high energetic demands, such as late gestation and early lactation (Oftedal 1984;White and Luick 1984), maternal traits may have stronger effects on offspring development than at other times. Maternal effects should be stronger at birth and during growth, and usually weaken with offspring age (Wilson and Festa-Bianchet 2009). In temperate and arctic environments, parturition usually occurs just before spring green-up (Côté and FestaBianchet 2001;Post et al 2003), and females partly rely on body reserves to provide maternal care (Crête and Huot 1993;Barboza and Parker 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, approaches that rely on asymmetrical patterns of resemblance of relatives in crossing schemes (e.g., Kever and Rotman 1987;Jarvis et al 2005) cannot directly differentiate maternal effects from other potential causes of asymmetry, such as genomic imprinting or uniparental inheritance such as cytoplasmic or sex chromosome inheritance (Wolf and Wade 2009). Other approaches, such as experimental cross-fostering (Bateman 1954;Cox et al 1959;White et al 1968), can detect maternal effects but cannot differentiate between maternal genetic and environmental sources unless a more complex design using related mothers is followed (Wilson et al 2005;Wilson and Festa-Bianchet 2009).More recently, genomic mapping approaches have been implemented to identify maternal genetic effects by mapping from the maternal genotype to offspring phenotypes. For example, Wolf et al (2002) used means of cross-fostered litters to identify maternal effects and Casellas et al (2009) mapped maternal effects in small chromosomal blocks in subcongenic mice by mapping maternal genotype to offspring phenotype using an unspecified linear model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, approaches that rely on asymmetrical patterns of resemblance of relatives in crossing schemes (e.g., Kever and Rotman 1987;Jarvis et al 2005) cannot directly differentiate maternal effects from other potential causes of asymmetry, such as genomic imprinting or uniparental inheritance such as cytoplasmic or sex chromosome inheritance (Wolf and Wade 2009). Other approaches, such as experimental cross-fostering (Bateman 1954;Cox et al 1959;White et al 1968), can detect maternal effects but cannot differentiate between maternal genetic and environmental sources unless a more complex design using related mothers is followed (Wilson et al 2005;Wilson and Festa-Bianchet 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%