2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal dietary diversity and risk of small for gestational age newborn: Findings from a case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the Average Requirements (AR) and/or Average Intake (AI) and Upper-Level intake (UL), we built three categories: (i) deficit intake (intake below AR/AI), (ii) adequate intake (intake between AR/AI and UL), and (iii) excessive intake (intake higher UL). To decrease potential measurement errors derived from the use of the FFQ (overestimation bias), we calculated the proportion of women with intakes below two thirds (2/3) of the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs), as other authors have reported previously [14,27]. Results were based on dietary intake data only, excluding supplements.…”
Section: Diet Quality: Nutrient Adequate Intakementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the Average Requirements (AR) and/or Average Intake (AI) and Upper-Level intake (UL), we built three categories: (i) deficit intake (intake below AR/AI), (ii) adequate intake (intake between AR/AI and UL), and (iii) excessive intake (intake higher UL). To decrease potential measurement errors derived from the use of the FFQ (overestimation bias), we calculated the proportion of women with intakes below two thirds (2/3) of the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs), as other authors have reported previously [14,27]. Results were based on dietary intake data only, excluding supplements.…”
Section: Diet Quality: Nutrient Adequate Intakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To correct possible errors derived from the FFQ, we excluded participants with energy intakes outside of predefined limits [17], and we used the residual method to adjust for food intake for energy intake. However, although the FFQ specifies the usual portion size as part of the question on frequency, it might not be the ideal tool to measure micronutrient intake and is not validated for this specific population group, although it has been used previously in pregnant women [14]. For this reason, we considered that intake was adequate only when the intake reached at least 2/3 of the recommendations proposed by EFSA for pregnant women, correcting the possible bias introduced by the FFQ and assuming, in any case, that the inadequate micronutrient intake (deficit intake or excessive intake) would be higher than the estimated figures [27].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dietary diversity score (DDS) was calculated using the method originally developed by Kant et al [23], which has recently been used by Farhangi et al [34] and Cano-Ibáñez et al [26,35]. Five food groups were considered in the construction of the DDS: vegetables, fruits, cereals, dairy products, and the protein food group.…”
Section: Dietary Diversity Score Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater adherence to a dietary pattern of fast food and sweets before pregnancy increases the chances of birth of a large-for-gestational-age newborn, while greater adherence to vegetables and dairy decreases the chances of premature delivery [53]. A higher prevalence of maternal nutritional deficiencies, a lower dietary diversity score, and consumption of a smaller variety of dairy products, have been significantly associated with a lower risk of having a small-for-gestational-age newborn [54].…”
Section: Effects Of Nutritional Status Of Pregnant Women On the Fetusmentioning
confidence: 99%