2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02091.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal complications following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping

Abstract: aObjective To investigate whether amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling increase the risk of bleeding, placental abruption, complications related to amniotic cavity and membranes, abnormal labour, operative deliveries and to investigate the impact of gestational length at the time of the procedure. Design A population-based cohort study.Setting Sweden, 1991Sweden, -1996

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intrauterine infection is a rare event after invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures 60 . According to data from large studies, the incidence of chorioamnionitis is 5 per 1,000 cases after CVS; 3.7 per 1,000 cases after amniocentesis; and 8.8 per 1000 cases after cordocentesis, compared with 3 per 1,000 cases in non-exposed women 61,62 . Infection is usually mild to moderate.…”
Section: Amniocentesis Chorionic Villous Sampling (Cvs): Routine Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrauterine infection is a rare event after invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures 60 . According to data from large studies, the incidence of chorioamnionitis is 5 per 1,000 cases after CVS; 3.7 per 1,000 cases after amniocentesis; and 8.8 per 1000 cases after cordocentesis, compared with 3 per 1,000 cases in non-exposed women 61,62 . Infection is usually mild to moderate.…”
Section: Amniocentesis Chorionic Villous Sampling (Cvs): Routine Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, speaking of safety, the Cochrane review showed that the transcervical CVS is more technically demanding than transabdominal CVS with more failures to obtain sample and more multiple insertions (Alfirevic et al,2003). There are no differences in birth weight , gestational age at delivery, or congenital malformations with either method (Cederholm et al,2003). Because of the specificity of the sampling route, transabdominal and transcervical sampling techniques are expected to have different types of contraindications.…”
Section: Transcervical Versus Transabdominal Chorionic Villus Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is some concern about the role of less serious infection in women who experience fetal loss after transcervical CVS. Because transcervical CVS involves passage of a cannula or forceps through the cervical canal from the perineum and vagina, microbial colonization and infection, with consequent morbidity for both mother and fetus, may result (Cederholm et al,2003).…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously reported a lower normal delivery rate after prenatal invasive testing, but no increase in preterm delivery or severe pregnancy complications such as abruption or placenta praevia were identified. 2,3 The aim of this population-based cohort study, including non-exposed controls, was to estimate the risk of maternal hypertensive complications in later gestations after first-and second-trimester prenatal invasive diagnostic procedures, AC and CVS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%