2016
DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal colonization with Streptococcus agalactiae and associated stillbirth and neonatal disease in coastal Kenya

Abstract: Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) causes neonatal disease and stillbirth, but its burden in sub-Saharan Africa is uncertain. We assessed maternal recto-vaginal GBS colonisation (7967 women), stillbirth and neonatal disease. Whole genome sequencing was used to determine serotypes, sequence types (ST), and phylogeny. We found low maternal GBS colonisation prevalence (934/7967, 12%), but comparatively high incidence of GBS-associated stillbirth and early onset neonatal disease (EOD) in hospita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
120
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(72 reference statements)
7
120
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlates of protection remain to be established to further validate the impact of this vaccine in the protection of HEU infants against GBS diseases. However, more studies are needed to assess whether or not HIV-infected pregnant women are colonized by specific strains (29, 32), which would impact vaccine policy. Evidence suggests that HEU infants are more likely to suffer from LOD (4, 13, 14); therefore, IAP that results in significant reductions in EOD will not contribute to a substantial decrease of GBS burden in this population (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Correlates of protection remain to be established to further validate the impact of this vaccine in the protection of HEU infants against GBS diseases. However, more studies are needed to assess whether or not HIV-infected pregnant women are colonized by specific strains (29, 32), which would impact vaccine policy. Evidence suggests that HEU infants are more likely to suffer from LOD (4, 13, 14); therefore, IAP that results in significant reductions in EOD will not contribute to a substantial decrease of GBS burden in this population (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased colonization rate in HIV-infected women with high CD4 cell count might be biased by the presence of other risk factors for GBS colonization like diabetes or obesity (23), which are expected to be found more often in women with higher CD4 cell counts (26) and were not taken into account. On the other hand, HIV-infected women with low CD4 cell count are known to have increased prevalence of bacterial vaginosis that could compete with GBS and are more likely to take cotrimoxazole prophylaxis resulting in lower GBS carriage rates (27–29). In the Cutland et al’s study, CD4 cell count was only available in a limited proportion of HIV-infected women but the majority had a CD4 count >350/mm 3 (24).…”
Section: Maternal Gbs Colonization In Hiv-infected Pregnant Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rare occurrence of certain GBS serotypes in maternal carriage and neonatal disease, however, makes it difficult to estimate these quantities with certainty, even in large samples. 20,21 While randomeffects meta-analysis of data from multiple epidemiologic studies may thus present an attractive analysis strategy, 22 investigators remain likely to encounter challenges when generating pooled risk ratios or odds ratios in the presence of zero-valued counts within studies. Common ad-hoc workarounds, such as "continuity corrections" adding a fixed value to cells [23][24][25] and simple summing or averaging of values across studies, 13 risk introducing bias in both point estimates and measures of uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Kenya,Seale et al, 2016), Canadian, American[Flores et al, 2015], Dutch and animal-derived strains using Roary, (ver. 3.8.0;Page et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%