2002
DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.2.195
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Maternal Cigarette Smoking, Metabolic Gene Polymorphism, and Infant Birth Weight

Abstract: In our study, maternal CYP1A1 and GSTT1 genotypes modified the association between maternal cigarette smoking and infant birth weight, suggesting an interaction between metabolic genes and cigarette smoking.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
472
59
44
33

Citation Types

10
297
2
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
502
39
27
10

Relationship

88
490

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 578 publications

(312 citation statements)
references

References 34 publications

10
297
2
3
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…There was no modifying effect on birth weight among mothers exposed to household air pollution from cooking fires. In contrast to our study, Wang et al found a modifying effect of the maternal GSTT1-null genotype on the relationship between active tobacco smoking during pregnancy and low birth weight among a multi-ethnic sample of 741 maternal-infant pairs in urban United States [17]. Continuous maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with a mean reduction of 377 grams in birth weight compared to birth weight of infants to mothers who never smoked (p<0.001).…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…There was no modifying effect on birth weight among mothers exposed to household air pollution from cooking fires. In contrast to our study, Wang et al found a modifying effect of the maternal GSTT1-null genotype on the relationship between active tobacco smoking during pregnancy and low birth weight among a multi-ethnic sample of 741 maternal-infant pairs in urban United States [17]. Continuous maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with a mean reduction of 377 grams in birth weight compared to birth weight of infants to mothers who never smoked (p<0.001).…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…31,32 Our study indicates that one of every five (21.7%) pregnant women use cigarettes, and approximately one of every 10 pregnant women (12.4%) are nicotine dependent in the United States. These results are consistent with previous reports, such as a study done by Wang et al 2 showing that approximately one of every 10 (13.2%) women used cigarettes while pregnant in the United States in 1997. In addition, our study provides detailed information in terms of the distribution of these behaviors across demographic groups in the United States population, as well as new data on prevalence of nicotine dependence among pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Smoking is a strong and independent predictor of birth weight [56, 57]. In our sample, smoking is associated with a 130 g (95% CI: 233, 27) decrease in adjusted mean birth weight, which is consistent with previous studies [58].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%