2019
DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique

Abstract: Background We aimed to analyze the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentations performed in our center between March 2011 and March 2016. We evaluated factors related to a successful ECV, delivery mode, complications and newborn status after ECV. Methods Analysis of assembled data of 327 consecutive ECVs in the third trimester was done. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the routine use of ECV resulted in an increase in vaginal delivery. Compared to the international literature, we observed a higher rate of vaginal delivery after NECV (15.5% described by Trobo et al vs. 66.8% in our population) [ 27 ]. Our total rate of vaginal delivery exceeds the German average of 6.75% vaginal delivery from breech presentation by far [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the routine use of ECV resulted in an increase in vaginal delivery. Compared to the international literature, we observed a higher rate of vaginal delivery after NECV (15.5% described by Trobo et al vs. 66.8% in our population) [ 27 ]. Our total rate of vaginal delivery exceeds the German average of 6.75% vaginal delivery from breech presentation by far [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Nulliparity has been associated with a lower ECV success rate [ 31 ]. The proportion of nulliparous women was lower in our population than in most studies, with approximately 55% nulliparity [ 27 , 32 , 33 ]. This could partially explain the lower success rates at our center.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations