2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01405.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal age and elective cesarean section in a low‐risk population

Abstract: We found a close association between maternal age and elective cesarean section in a low-risk population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies reported neither reasons for CS nor proportions of planned versus emergency CS. The included studies adjusted for maternal age – a known confounder, since the incidence of elective CS increases significantly with increasing maternal age – are presented in Table S1 . A large national register cohort from Canada showed a three‐fold increased risk [AOR, 3.1 (95% CI, 3.0–3.3)] in overall severe maternal morbidity including haemorrhage requiring hysterectomy, cardiac arrest, venous thromboembolism and major infection in almost 47 000 planned low‐risk CS versus more than 2.3 million planned low‐risk vaginal deliveries .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies reported neither reasons for CS nor proportions of planned versus emergency CS. The included studies adjusted for maternal age – a known confounder, since the incidence of elective CS increases significantly with increasing maternal age – are presented in Table S1 . A large national register cohort from Canada showed a three‐fold increased risk [AOR, 3.1 (95% CI, 3.0–3.3)] in overall severe maternal morbidity including haemorrhage requiring hysterectomy, cardiac arrest, venous thromboembolism and major infection in almost 47 000 planned low‐risk CS versus more than 2.3 million planned low‐risk vaginal deliveries .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women with medical conditions significantly associated with elective caesarean section were excluded (37% of the total primiparous population and 31% of primiparas with gestational age ≥37 weeks, increasing from 29% among women aged <20 years to 45% in those aged ≥40 years). 19 In the remaining low-risk population the associations between maternal age and mode of delivery were explored using descriptive statistics, contingency tables, chi-square tests, Student's t-tests, and one-way between-groups analysis of variance (ANOVA), with a post-hoc test with Bonferroni correction. Similar procedures were performed to evaluate the in-labour indications, sociodemographic factors, and other contributing factors for emergency caesarean section.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous meta‐analysis suggested a strong association between caesarean delivery and increased offspring BMI (Darmasseelane, Hyde, Santhakumaran, Gale, & Modi, ), and evidence shows that the rate of elective (i.e., not medically indicated) caesarean section increases with advancing maternal age (Herstad et al, ). We also observed a much higher proportion of children delivered by caesarean section in the group with maternal age at birth of ≥31 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%