2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02040.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maternal adversity and ecological stressors in natural populations: the role of stress axis programming in individuals, with implications for populations and communities

Abstract: Summary1. Biomedical researchers have long appreciated that maternal stressors can induce preparative and adaptive programming in offspring via exposure to maternal Glucocorticoids (GCs). However, few ecologists are aware of the capacity for maternal GC exposure to translate ecological and environmental stressors into preparative and adaptive programmed offspring responses in free-living systems. We review a growing body of experimental work indicating that circulating maternal GCs link ecological stressors wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
159
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(409 reference statements)
5
159
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although few studies have assessed HPI responsiveness in fish as a result of maternal stress, studies on avian and mammalian species are more abundant (reviewed by Love et al, 2013). Maternal programming of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis responsiveness in mammals has been well studied for both the prenatal (by maternal stress, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although few studies have assessed HPI responsiveness in fish as a result of maternal stress, studies on avian and mammalian species are more abundant (reviewed by Love et al, 2013). Maternal programming of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis responsiveness in mammals has been well studied for both the prenatal (by maternal stress, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many of the phenotypic consequences of developmental stress appear overwhelmingly negative, there is increasing evidence for an adaptive function of developmental stress (reviewed in [65][66][67][68][69]). For example, stress exposure during development may induce phenotypic changes which prepare developing animals to live in harsh environments or match offspring needs to parental capabilities [8,56,66].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To move this field ahead in a productive manner, we suggest that three critical points must be considered prior to assigning any hypothetical adaptive or maladaptive value to maternal‐stress effects ( sensu Love et al., 2013; Sheriff & Love, 2013; Uller et al., 2013; Sheriff et al., 2017). First, we must appreciate that the value of any phenotype, whether stress‐induced or not, can only be understood by examining performance or fitness in an ecologically relevant context (and not simply assuming the outcome based on the phenotype alone).…”
Section: Evaluating the Potential Adaptive Value Of Maternal Stress Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this phenomenon has been increasingly studied in vertebrates in the context of maternal‐stress effects, largely because the maternal phenotype or cue that may induce plasticity in offspring traits (maternal stress hormone levels) is both measurable and amenable to experimental manipulations. In vertebrates, exposure to maternally derived stress hormones (glucocorticoids; i.e., “maternal stress”) is increasingly recognized as a significant factor mediating transgenerational phenotypic plasticity in offspring (Barbazanges, Piazza, Moal, & Maccari, 1996; Gluckman, Hanson, & Spencer, 2005; Love, McGowan, & Sheriff, 2013; Meaney, Szyf, & Seckl, 2007). The consequences of maternal stress have long been considered to be maladaptive in biomedical fields because offspring phenotypes that can occur in response to maternal stress (e.g., smaller size, slower growth, lower energetic demand, higher anxiety‐like behavior) are assumed to confer reduced fitness (Sheriff & Love, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%