Matériaux pour l'édition de Guillaume de Jumièges préparée par Jules Lair, membre de l'Institut, préface de Leopold Delisle, membre de l'Institut

Lair, Jules; Delisle, Léopold

doi:10.3406/bec.1910.452497

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In fact, it was by no means uncommon for twelfth-century historians and their copyists to preface works of historiography with similar rubricsthe surviving books from the library of Mont-Saint-Michel, where Robert continued his career after 1154, suffice as a case in point. 57 Also, the relationship which Dumville assumes between the HA's rubric and the entry in the Le Bec book list which survives in Avranches 159 can, upon closer examination, be defined much more accurately. First of all, it is important to note that Avranches 159 features not just one, but in fact two book lists on its flyleaves.…”

Section: Le Bec's Twelfth-century Library Catalogue and Leiden Universiteitsbibliotheek Ms Bpl 20mentioning

confidence: 99%

When Did Robert of Torigni First Receive Henry of Huntingdon’s Historia Anglorum, and Why Does It Matter?

Pohl¹

2015

The Haskins Society Journal 26

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, 1 I seek to shed new light on a question which, to date, has been little more than a subtle chronological debate amongst historians. Previous studies have left little room for doubt that Robert of Torigni consulted Henry of Huntingdon's Historia Anglorum (referred to hereafter as HA) for the composition of his own magnum opus, the Chronica. 2 There is, however, much less certainty as to when, precisely, Robert first received a manuscript copy of Henry's work at the monastery of Le Bec in Normandy. Was it in 1139, the year in which Henry temporarily ceased his work in order to accompany Archbishop Theobald of Canterbury on a mission to the European mainland? Or was it several years later, when Henry had long since resumed his work on the HA, causing it to evolve into an even more substantial historical narrative? And why does it matter? Finding an answer to these questionshowever esoteric they might at first appearpromises to produce knowledge of which the significance extends beyond the intertextual relationship between Henry's HA and Robert's Chronica.By identifying the precise dynamics of Robert's interaction with Henry, as well as the logistics and channels of communication which connected the two historians and their works, I aim to offer an innovative lens through which to investigate similar texts and contexts in a wider chronological and geographical framework. 'Intertextuality', in this context, will be showcased not merely as a theoretical, but rather as a practical concept for the study of medieval historiography.I commence this study by challenging the prevailing notion that Robert was presented with a copy of the HA as early as 1139. Instead, I produce evidence to suggest a later date, one closer to Robert's appointment as prior of Le Bec in 1149. 3 My argument consists of three strands, represented here as three thematic sections. Each of these sections focuses on a separate yet related piece of the one argued for in this article. First, I analyse and compare different narrative accounts which testify to Robert's involvement with the HA. I then turn directly to the medieval manuscript tradition in order to develop a clearer notion as to which version or redaction of the text Robert is likely to have used for the composition of his Chronica. 4 Finally, I reassess the place of the HA within the monastic library of Le Bec during the twelfth century. Prior to commencing this line of enquiry, however, I must briefly recapitulate the argument for dating as it stands today.Generally speaking, scholarly consensus has it that Robert was first presented with a manuscript copy of the HA in 1139, the very year when Henry travelled to Le Bec in the company of Archbishop Theobald and, allegedly, showed Robert a manuscript containing his work-in-progress. 5 Scholars hypothesise that Henry granted Robert access to his working copy of the HA as an act of reciprocity, in return for being presented with a copy of Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia regum Britanniae (referred to hereafter as HRB). Fol...

show abstract

Section: Le Bec's Twelfth-century Library Catalogue and Leiden Universiteitsbibliotheek Ms Bpl 20mentioning

confidence: 99%

When Did Robert of Torigni First Receive Henry of Huntingdon’s Historia Anglorum, and Why Does It Matter?

Pohl¹

2015

The Haskins Society Journal 26

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Abbas qui et scriptor?: The Handwriting of Robert of Torigni and His Scribal Activity as Abbot of Mont-Saint-Michel (1154–1186)

Pohl¹

2014

Traditio

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Matériaux pour l'édition de Guillaume de Jumièges préparée par Jules Lair, membre de l'Institut, préface de Leopold Delisle, membre de l'Institut

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

When Did Robert of Torigni First Receive Henry of Huntingdon’s Historia Anglorum, and Why Does It Matter?

When Did Robert of Torigni First Receive Henry of Huntingdon’s Historia Anglorum, and Why Does It Matter?

Abbas qui et scriptor?: The Handwriting of Robert of Torigni and His Scribal Activity as Abbot of Mont-Saint-Michel (1154–1186)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About