2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materials Informatics with PoreBlazer v4.0 and the CSD MOF Database

Abstract: The development of computational methods to explore crystalline materials has received significant attention in the last decades. Different codes have been reported to help researchers to evaluate and learn about the structure of materials and to understand and predict their properties. In this Methods article, we present an updated version of PoreBlazer, an openaccess, open-source Fortran 90 code to calculate structural properties of porous materials. The article describes the properties calculated by the cod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
150
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(118 reference statements)
4
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorption isotherms of N2 are simulated using the grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) method as implemented in the RASPA simulation package 26 . The geometric properties have been calculated using Poreblazer 27,28 . A more detailed description about the methodology and model parameters is given in the Supplementary Information, page S3.…”
Section: Molecular Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption isotherms of N2 are simulated using the grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) method as implemented in the RASPA simulation package 26 . The geometric properties have been calculated using Poreblazer 27,28 . A more detailed description about the methodology and model parameters is given in the Supplementary Information, page S3.…”
Section: Molecular Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed the PORE code to calculate porosities and related proper- needs the unit cell parameters and the coordinates of the atoms as input, similar to alternative implementations. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Three different approaches to calculate porosities are implemented, namely a He approach (HEA), an overlapping spheres approach (OSA), and a grid point approach (GPA). The HEA is based on an cell list approach to predict He-fraction-like porosities, making it numerically efficient.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The open‐source porE code is available under Apache 2.0 license at GitHub , see https://github.com/kaitrepte/porE, and can easily be installed through the Python pip package manager. For calculations using porE , one only needs the unit cell parameters and the coordinates of the atoms as input, similar to alternative implementations 14–19 …”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30] To the best of our knowledge, less than 0.003% of all known MOFs reported in the structural databases are phosphonate MOFs, which are constructed using aromatic phosphonic acid linkers. 25,31,32 Owing to the aforementioned advantages, phosphonate MOFs may allow for structural variations that generate high electrical conductivity and high surface areas for charge holding and be sufficiently stable for use in industrial applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%