2002
DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2002.1033775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Materialization and its metaclass implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20). The difference in how that is accomplished is that in the powertype approach described here, two M2 classes are used which differentiate between the concept and the category (see also [8,14]) In contrast, both the element and the element kind are confounded when using the potency-based approach, although of course there is one less element in the overall architectural scheme.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20). The difference in how that is accomplished is that in the powertype approach described here, two M2 classes are used which differentiate between the concept and the category (see also [8,14]) In contrast, both the element and the element kind are confounded when using the potency-based approach, although of course there is one less element in the overall architectural scheme.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Design Ontology [123] the content of a model is understood as a 'proposition', along with the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) [124], namely an abstract entity that lacks space-time location and is represented via a language. Similarly, in the literature about conceptual modeling, a product as a material object is distinguished from its corresponding product type, which refers to properties that the former has to satisfy [125,126]. 3 Following these approaches, I-features are (typically complex) properties used to define product types.…”
Section: Basic Elements For An Ontological Modeling Of Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular approaches with support for multilevel (meta-)modeling are powertypes [16,5], deep instantiation [1], and materialization [17,3]. The instances of a powertype are subtypes of another object type, thereby providing metamodeling capabilities [16, p. 28].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%