The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1992
DOI: 10.1121/1.403955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material tailoring of structures to achieve a minimum radiation condition

Abstract: A strategy is developed for designing structures that radiate sound inefficiently in light fluids. The problem is broken into two steps. First, given a frequency and overall geometry of the structure, a surface velocity distribution is found that produces a minimum radiation condition. This particular velocity distribution is referred to as the "weak radiator" velocity profile. Second, a distribution of Young's modulus and density distribution is found for the structure such that it exhibits the weak radiator … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that example, the "rst eigenfrequency of an engine cover plate was decreased while the radiated noise level was reduced by about 12 dB. Similar investigations [17] were reported for piecewise constant material data like Young's modulus or density. Reductions between 2 and 23 dB were achieved.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In that example, the "rst eigenfrequency of an engine cover plate was decreased while the radiated noise level was reduced by about 12 dB. Similar investigations [17] were reported for piecewise constant material data like Young's modulus or density. Reductions between 2 and 23 dB were achieved.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Shape optimization has been shown to be effective by Bernard (1985) and Wilcox and Lalor (1987). More recent work in this area has been carried out by Lamancusa (1988), Sivakumar et al (1991) and Naghshineh et al (1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An alternative to this would be to calculate the optimum modal weight vector from a purely acoustic optimisation procedure, as described by Naghshineh et al in Ref. [14] and then try to adjust the structural parameters in order to obtain the desired modal weight vector. However, one of the problems with this approach is that matching the calculated modal weight vector with the desired modal weight vector cannot be achieved perfectly under all constraint mass and stiffener conditions.…”
Section: Optimisation To Achieve Weak Acoustical Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%