2004
DOI: 10.1080/00207540310001619641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material removal model for vibratory finishing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In industrial practice, lubrication mechanism for vibratory finishing is almost exclusively circulatory which is expected to remove debris and provide a better finish. Finally, experiments with different media geometry suggested that higher geometrical sharpness results in a rougher surface finish, as observed in [4] and [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In industrial practice, lubrication mechanism for vibratory finishing is almost exclusively circulatory which is expected to remove debris and provide a better finish. Finally, experiments with different media geometry suggested that higher geometrical sharpness results in a rougher surface finish, as observed in [4] and [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Media geometry is also known to affect polishing results. Experimental studies show that Material Removal Rate (MRR) is maximum for media with the highest roughness [5]. Presence of grooves on media surface and increased number of edges increases the MRR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domblesky et al [14,15] conducted an experimental investigation of the vibratory finishing process, and presented the model of material removal rate as a function of bowl acceleration. Fraas [16] provided useful results in the motion analysis of granular solids in fluidized beds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, very small sliding motion of media on workpieces was indicated. Domblesky et al [6,7] investigated bowl type vibratory finishing processes and proposed a model to describe material removal rate. The model indicated that the rate remained constant over time and was governed by bowl acceleration, workpiece mass and velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%