2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material parameters identification: Gradient-based, genetic and hybrid optimization algorithms

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis paper presents two procedures for the identification of material parameters, a genetic algorithm and a gradient-based algorithm. These algorithms enable both the yield criterion and the work hardening parameters to be identified. A hybrid algorithm is also used, which is a combination of the former two, in such a way that the result of the genetic algorithm is considered as the initial values for the gradient-based algorithm. The objective of this approach is to improve the performance of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multi-set of nonlinear equations was established and then, the obtained equations were solved to determine the required parameters using an iterative technique such as Newton-Raphson approach. In other studies (Chaparro et al, 2008;Mahmoudi et al, 2011), genetic algorithm (GA) was used to minimize the difference between the numerical predictions and the experimental results when calibrating the NLKH models. However, FEMU has a drawback that it is time-consuming due to the iterative nature of the FE model updating process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-set of nonlinear equations was established and then, the obtained equations were solved to determine the required parameters using an iterative technique such as Newton-Raphson approach. In other studies (Chaparro et al, 2008;Mahmoudi et al, 2011), genetic algorithm (GA) was used to minimize the difference between the numerical predictions and the experimental results when calibrating the NLKH models. However, FEMU has a drawback that it is time-consuming due to the iterative nature of the FE model updating process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth case only considers torsion. The optimal position of the mechanical components on the external fixator is obtained from a real-coded genetic algorithm [32], in which the objective function is the minimization of the norm of the resulting displacement in the fracture focus according to where u x , u y and u z represents the displacement in the x, y and z directions, respectively. The considered settings and genetic operators used within the genetic algorithm are presented in table 2.…”
Section: Optimization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization problem expressed by equation (9) is solved using a genetic algorithm, specially recommended for the solution of curve fitting problems [22].…”
Section: Wind Turbine Blade Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%