Abstract:Since 1948 the re-designation of depopulated Palestinian villages as national parks has evoked Lippet's 'cartography of nowhere', as ruins and unmarked sites are subsumed in the process of material forgetting. Juxtaposing narratives and material mnemonics, this article assumes the villages of Deir Yassin, Suba, Kufr Bir'im and Iqrit as case studies to determine the extent to which memory infuses ruins with the ability to counter contemporary narratives. The article subsequently explores the use of debris in th… Show more
“…Israel employs green colonies to Judaise, Europeanise, and dehistoricise Palestine, obliterating Palestinian identity and quelling resistance to Israeli oppression (Abu-Sitta, 2011; Balsam, 2011: 94; Gandolfo, 2017: 196). Notably, it is under the banner of ‘making the desert bloom’ that Israel plants them (Kershnar et al, 2011: 4–5).…”
Section: Unearthing Israeli Green Colonialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Israel’s genocidal aims are advanced by its dehistoricisation of Palestine – utilising protected areas – manifesting in the erosion of Palestinian identity and resistance to Israeli oppression (Abu-Sitta, 2011; Gandolfo, 2017: 196). Paralleling its cooption of hummus and falafel, Israel’s marginalization of the Arabic language and appropriation of Palestinian-built bustans, within green colonies, threaten to eliminate distinctive societal and environmental contributions, verily the identity of Palestinians (Abu-Sitta, 2011; Kadman, 2010; Pappé, 2006).…”
Section: Unearthing Israeli Green Colonialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential is even more forcefully stifled by the greenwashing of the Nakba and robbing of spaces where powerful and creative forms of resurgence can occur (Gandolfo, 2017;Masalha, 2012). Israelis can contentedly hike and serve in the military, rather than be compelled to acknowledge the colonial history of Israel, their complicity, and say: 'Not in My Name' (Bauman, 2004;Pappé, 2006).…”
Section: Dehistoricisation Judaisation and Europeanisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will begin by theorising Israeli green colonialism as a Zionist and Western environmental phenomenon (Grove, 1995;McKee, 2016: 156). Next, I will delve into the four major arguments I presented above, before outlining forms of Palestinian, land, and global resistance against this form of aggression (Gandolfo, 2017;Pappé, 2006;Zatoun, n.d.). Drawing on Palestinian history, traditions, perspectives, and knowledge, I will then offer an alternative and more equitable form of environmentalism, while firmly rejecting the racist trope of the ecological savage (Nadasdy, 2005;Simaan, 2017).…”
This article provides a comprehensive overview of Israeli green colonialism, denoting the apartheid state’s misappropriation of environmentalism to eliminate the Indigenous people of Palestine and usurp its resources. I focus on the violence of ‘protected areas’, encompassing national parks, forests, and nature reserves. This article argues that Israel primarily establishes them to (1) justify land grab; (2) prevent the return of Palestinian refugees; (3) dehistoricise, Judaise, and Europeanise Palestine, erasing Palestinian identity and suppressing resistance to Israeli oppression; and (4) greenwash its apartheid image. I situate Israeli green colonialism within the broader histories of Western environmentalism – particularly its perpetuation of the human–nature binary – and Zionism. Furthermore, I identify various means through which Palestinians and their land resist this phenomenon. I also explore Palestinian environmentalism, which is influenced by the concepts of a’wna (collaboration), sumud (steadfastness), and a’wda (return), in addition to the Islamic concept of tawhid (unity). I offer it as an alternative environmentalism, which is holistic, anti-racist, feminist, socialist, and nonlinear, while rejecting the trope of the ecological savage. Overall, the intrinsic link between all humans, and them and the environment must be recognised, to realise a just and sustainable society, in Palestine and beyond.
“…Israel employs green colonies to Judaise, Europeanise, and dehistoricise Palestine, obliterating Palestinian identity and quelling resistance to Israeli oppression (Abu-Sitta, 2011; Balsam, 2011: 94; Gandolfo, 2017: 196). Notably, it is under the banner of ‘making the desert bloom’ that Israel plants them (Kershnar et al, 2011: 4–5).…”
Section: Unearthing Israeli Green Colonialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Israel’s genocidal aims are advanced by its dehistoricisation of Palestine – utilising protected areas – manifesting in the erosion of Palestinian identity and resistance to Israeli oppression (Abu-Sitta, 2011; Gandolfo, 2017: 196). Paralleling its cooption of hummus and falafel, Israel’s marginalization of the Arabic language and appropriation of Palestinian-built bustans, within green colonies, threaten to eliminate distinctive societal and environmental contributions, verily the identity of Palestinians (Abu-Sitta, 2011; Kadman, 2010; Pappé, 2006).…”
Section: Unearthing Israeli Green Colonialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential is even more forcefully stifled by the greenwashing of the Nakba and robbing of spaces where powerful and creative forms of resurgence can occur (Gandolfo, 2017;Masalha, 2012). Israelis can contentedly hike and serve in the military, rather than be compelled to acknowledge the colonial history of Israel, their complicity, and say: 'Not in My Name' (Bauman, 2004;Pappé, 2006).…”
Section: Dehistoricisation Judaisation and Europeanisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will begin by theorising Israeli green colonialism as a Zionist and Western environmental phenomenon (Grove, 1995;McKee, 2016: 156). Next, I will delve into the four major arguments I presented above, before outlining forms of Palestinian, land, and global resistance against this form of aggression (Gandolfo, 2017;Pappé, 2006;Zatoun, n.d.). Drawing on Palestinian history, traditions, perspectives, and knowledge, I will then offer an alternative and more equitable form of environmentalism, while firmly rejecting the racist trope of the ecological savage (Nadasdy, 2005;Simaan, 2017).…”
This article provides a comprehensive overview of Israeli green colonialism, denoting the apartheid state’s misappropriation of environmentalism to eliminate the Indigenous people of Palestine and usurp its resources. I focus on the violence of ‘protected areas’, encompassing national parks, forests, and nature reserves. This article argues that Israel primarily establishes them to (1) justify land grab; (2) prevent the return of Palestinian refugees; (3) dehistoricise, Judaise, and Europeanise Palestine, erasing Palestinian identity and suppressing resistance to Israeli oppression; and (4) greenwash its apartheid image. I situate Israeli green colonialism within the broader histories of Western environmentalism – particularly its perpetuation of the human–nature binary – and Zionism. Furthermore, I identify various means through which Palestinians and their land resist this phenomenon. I also explore Palestinian environmentalism, which is influenced by the concepts of a’wna (collaboration), sumud (steadfastness), and a’wda (return), in addition to the Islamic concept of tawhid (unity). I offer it as an alternative environmentalism, which is holistic, anti-racist, feminist, socialist, and nonlinear, while rejecting the trope of the ecological savage. Overall, the intrinsic link between all humans, and them and the environment must be recognised, to realise a just and sustainable society, in Palestine and beyond.
“…ARDID's representative explained that though several political leaders have endorsed the rulings, the army and state continues to deny it in a fear that it would set a precedent which would encourage other internally displaced Palestinians to claim similar rights. Since the 1970s, the village has been a locus of political activities, which try to pressure for implementing the made decisions (Gandolfo 2017;Ryan 1973), and the recent action of return is a continuation to this struggle.…”
In this paper, I examine the activities of internally displaced Palestinians as performative resistance against the settler-colonial dispossession. Since 1948, when close to 800,000 Palestinians were displaced from their homes in the process of establishing the state of Israel, return has been a key political objective of the displaced. By concentrating on the recent activities organized by internally displaced Palestinians, I scrutinize the power of performative practices in challenging present conditions of continuing displacement. Based on interviews, participatory observation, and published source material, I show how the return activities concentrating on the lost villages do not only commemorate the past but also utilize it in performative claim-making in achieving the desired future. I make the argument that the performative dimensions of claiming work to undermine the settler-colonial reality by issuing a call for a right to belong and for a more just future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.