1973
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7225(73)90031-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material indifference: A principle or a convenience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Said differently, any average ascribed to time t is performed over the time interval t À Á ( t in inertial frames, and then referred at time t to a general frame. Finally, resurrecting superscript F+_ (see footnote 21), material points can be associated bijectively with geometrical points in the region occupied by M þ at any time 22 in such a way that they trace out the trajectories of field v þ w;Á . REMARK 12.…”
Section: Time Averaging and Mass Balance For Time-dependent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Said differently, any average ascribed to time t is performed over the time interval t À Á ( t in inertial frames, and then referred at time t to a general frame. Finally, resurrecting superscript F+_ (see footnote 21), material points can be associated bijectively with geometrical points in the region occupied by M þ at any time 22 in such a way that they trace out the trajectories of field v þ w;Á . REMARK 12.…”
Section: Time Averaging and Mass Balance For Time-dependent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though a subject of controversy (Edelen and McLennan [1]; Wang [15]), the requirement of material frame indifference (MFI) plays a major role in constitutive theory (Noll [10]; Oldroyd [11]; Truesdell and Toupin [14]). Part of the disagreement lies in whether MFI should be adopted or a less restrictive requirement, the principle of Galilean invariance, should be used to formulate constitutive relations.…”
Section: Interfacial Jump Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we need to decide whether we will enforce the requirement of material frame indifference for this problem. We are aware of the controversy surrounding this topic (Edelen and McLennan [1]; Wang [15]) and we will not pursue a thorough discussion of it. We require Galilean invariance, instead of the more restrictive material frame indifference, within the framework of classical non-relativistic theory, for the sake of consistency to put the constitutive relations on the electromagnetic and the thermodynamic quantities on the same footing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle and also its formulation initiated a long and unfinished discussion among those who are interested in the fundamental aspects of continuum physics. Here we give an incomplete list of the most important looking related works [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%