2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material flows and resource productivity in China, South Korea and Japan from 1970 to 2008: A transitional perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of long-term trends in resource use as well as comparative cross-country datasets 81,82 investigate the potentials for decoupling the use of materials and energy from economic growth and wellbeing 83 . Material flow accounting and substance flow analysis can be combined to provide detailed assessment of flows of specific materials and substances.…”
Section: Materials and Energy Flow Analysis (Mefa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of long-term trends in resource use as well as comparative cross-country datasets 81,82 investigate the potentials for decoupling the use of materials and energy from economic growth and wellbeing 83 . Material flow accounting and substance flow analysis can be combined to provide detailed assessment of flows of specific materials and substances.…”
Section: Materials and Energy Flow Analysis (Mefa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Dong et al (2017) distinguished between developing, primary developed and mature industrialized countries, while Steinberger et al (2013) highlighted the difference between the metabolic regimes of China and Germany. Figure 1 shows a scatterplot of DMC per capita and GDP per capita for a sample of European countries over the 2000-2015 period.…”
Section: The Socio-metabolic Regimes Of Territoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While they have contributed to the economic growth and social development, they also play a negative role at generating significant environmental impacts, like GHG and air emissions, water pollution, land contamination, and over-consumption of resources and energy. Thus, a green transmission of industrial parks is an effective way to green the national economy [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An eco-industrial park (EIP) is defined as an industrial complex in which efforts to minimize the generation of waste, by-products, pollutants, and/or unused energy apply, by utilizing them in a closed loop among processes by companies in the industrial park [16][17][18][19]. In this way, various firms inside the park or processes of the firm try to use the waste/by-products as the raw material inputs and share the infrastructures correspondingly [4,11,20]. The sustainability of the built environment can be hereby improved as well [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%