Material description of fluxes in terms of differential forms

Abstract

The flux of a certain extensive physical quantity across a surface is often represented by the integral over the surface of the component of a pseudo-vector normal to the surface. A pseudo-vector is in fact a possible representation of a second-order differential form, i.e. a skew-symmetric second-order covariant tensor, which follows the regular transformation laws of tensors. However, because of the skew-symmetry of differential forms, the associated pseudo-vector follows a transformation law that is different from that of proper vectors, and is named after the Italian mathematical physicist Gabrio Piola (1794-1850). In this work, we employ the methods of Differential Geometry and the representation in terms of differential forms to demonstrate how the flux of an extensive quantity transforms from the spatial to the material point of view. After an introduction to the theory of differential forms, their transformation laws, and their role in integration theory, we apply them to the case of first-order transport laws such as Darcy's law and Ohm's law.

Computational prediction of strain-dependent diffusion of transcription factors through the cell nucleus

“…2 does not include the additional terms which refer the jacobian-dependent diffusivity D to the initial configuration, see (Federico et al. 2015 ). The experimental information available so far was not sufficient to identify the “actual” functional dependence of diffusivity on J or on other field variables (e.g., on the concentration itself), and Eq.…”

Inverse dynamics in rigid body mechanics

“…We are now ready to assemble Equations (5.3) into the single 6 × 6 equation (5.4) 11 See the discussion on the transformation of two-forms, i.e., second-order skew-symmetric tensors, in [16].…”

Untitled

“…Here we review some basic definitions of continuum mechanics, in order to elucidate the notation that we employ. The notation is essentially that of Truesdell and Noll [1965] and Marsden and Hughes [1983], with some modifications [Federico 2012;Federico et al 2016]. We work in a simplified setting based on the use of affine spaces, whose rigorous definition can be found, e.g., in the treatise by Epstein [2010].…”