Material and abutment selection for CAD/CAM implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients – A narrative review

Abstract

Restorative material selection has become increasingly challenging due to the speed of new developments in the field of dental material science. The present narrative review gives an overview of the current indications for implant abutments and restoration materials for provisional and definitive implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients. For single implant restorations, titanium base abutments for crowns are suggested as an alternative to the conventional stock‐ and customized abutments made out of metal or zirconia. They combine the mechanical stability of a metallic connection with the esthetic potential of ceramics. For multiple‐unit restorations, conical titanium bases especially designed for bridges are recommended, to compensate for deviating implant insertion axes and angulations. Even though titanium base abutments with different geometries and heights are available, certain clinical scenarios still benefit from customized titanium abutments. Indications for the definitive material in fixed implant restorations depend on the region of tooth replacement. In the posterior (not esthetically critical) zone, ceramics such as zirconia (3–5‐Ymol%) and lithium‐disilicate are recommended to be used in a monolithic fashion. In the anterior sector, ceramic restorations may be buccally micro‐veneered for an optimal esthetic appearance. Lithium‐disilicate is only recommended for single‐crowns, while zirconia (3–5‐Ymol%) is also recommended for multiple‐unit and cantilever restorations. Attention must be given to the specific mechanical properties of different types of zirconia, as some feature reduced mechanical strengths and are therefore not indicated for all regions and restoration span lengths. Metal‐ceramics remain an option, especially for cantilever restorations.