2022
DOI: 10.24072/pcjournal.177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MATEdb, a data repository of high-quality metazoan transcriptome assemblies to accelerate phylogenomic studies

Abstract: Vargas-Chávez (2022) MATEdb, a data repository of high-quality metazoan transcriptome assemblies to accelerate phylogenomic studies,

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain the phylogenetic relatedness information required for the phylogenetic comparative methods, we combined the time‐scaled ultrametric species trees for each phylum. Vertebrate and onychophoran time trees were obtained from the literature (Baker et al, 2021; Irisarri et al, 2017) and pruned to keep only a selection of 13 vertebrate species whose aquaporins have previously been studied (Finn et al, 2014) and the four onychophorans (or closely‐related species) that were included in MATEdb (Fernández et al, 2022), respectively. For the rest of the phyla, arthropods, molluscs and annelids, time‐scaled ultrametric trees were inferred independently by using a node‐dating approach on species trees that followed the most recent topologies (Anderson & Lindgren, 2021; Ballesteros et al, 2022; Colgan et al, 2007; Cunha & Giribet, 2019; Doğan et al, 2020; Erséus et al, 2020; Fernández et al, 2018; González et al, 2015; Johnson et al, 2018; Kallal et al, 2021; Kawahara et al, 2019; Kocot et al, 2011, 2013, 2020, 2017, 2019; Lee et al, 2019; Lindgren, 2010; Lozano‐Fernandez et al, 2019; McKenna et al, 2019; Misof et al, 2014; Moles & Giribet, 2021; Ontano et al, 2021; Pabst & Kocot, 2018; Peters et al, 2017; Razkin et al, 2015; Richter, 2001; Salvi & Mariottini, 2016; Schwentner et al, 2018; Smith, 2021; Smith et al, 2011; Sun et al, 2020; Uribe et al, 2016; Uribe & Zardoya, 2017; Wang et al, 2017; Wiegmann et al, 2011; Yang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the phylogenetic relatedness information required for the phylogenetic comparative methods, we combined the time‐scaled ultrametric species trees for each phylum. Vertebrate and onychophoran time trees were obtained from the literature (Baker et al, 2021; Irisarri et al, 2017) and pruned to keep only a selection of 13 vertebrate species whose aquaporins have previously been studied (Finn et al, 2014) and the four onychophorans (or closely‐related species) that were included in MATEdb (Fernández et al, 2022), respectively. For the rest of the phyla, arthropods, molluscs and annelids, time‐scaled ultrametric trees were inferred independently by using a node‐dating approach on species trees that followed the most recent topologies (Anderson & Lindgren, 2021; Ballesteros et al, 2022; Colgan et al, 2007; Cunha & Giribet, 2019; Doğan et al, 2020; Erséus et al, 2020; Fernández et al, 2018; González et al, 2015; Johnson et al, 2018; Kallal et al, 2021; Kawahara et al, 2019; Kocot et al, 2011, 2013, 2020, 2017, 2019; Lee et al, 2019; Lindgren, 2010; Lozano‐Fernandez et al, 2019; McKenna et al, 2019; Misof et al, 2014; Moles & Giribet, 2021; Ontano et al, 2021; Pabst & Kocot, 2018; Peters et al, 2017; Razkin et al, 2015; Richter, 2001; Salvi & Mariottini, 2016; Schwentner et al, 2018; Smith, 2021; Smith et al, 2011; Sun et al, 2020; Uribe et al, 2016; Uribe & Zardoya, 2017; Wang et al, 2017; Wiegmann et al, 2011; Yang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the remaining 415 invertebrate species were obtained from MATEdb (Fernández et al, 2022), which provides standard comparable proteomes for phylogenomic studies. We downloaded the gene annotation of those species (longest isoform for each gene), and their taxonomic and habitat information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertebrate and onychophoran time trees were obtained from the literature (Baker, Buckman-Young, Costa, & Giribet, 2021; Irisarri et al, 2017) and pruned to keep only a selection of 13 vertebrate species whose aquaporins have previously been studied (Finn et al, 2014) and the 4 onychophorans (or closely-related species) that were included in MATEdb (Fernández et al, 2022), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the raw data processing pipeline explained in (Fernández et al 2022) with a few modifications. For RNA-seq data, adapters and low-quality reads were trimmed using fastp v.0.20.041, and de novo assembly was performed using Trinity v2.1142 with default parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%