2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mate retention, semen displacement, and human sperm competition: a preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
115
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interest in mate retention behavior has penetrated several research domains, including personality psychology (McKibbin et al 2014), sexual behavior (Goetz et al 2005), and ovulatory cycling (Gangestad et al 2002). The current research adds to this literature by highlighting the importance of mate retention with assistance from allies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Interest in mate retention behavior has penetrated several research domains, including personality psychology (McKibbin et al 2014), sexual behavior (Goetz et al 2005), and ovulatory cycling (Gangestad et al 2002). The current research adds to this literature by highlighting the importance of mate retention with assistance from allies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Those questioning the application of sperm competition to humans (e.g., Birkhead, 2000;Dixson, 1998;Gomendio, Harcourt, & Roldán, 1998) contend that sperm competition in humans, although possible, may not be as intense as in other species with adaptations to sperm competition. Recent work on the psychological, behavioral, and anatomical evidence of human sperm competition (e.g., Gallup et al, 2003;Goetz et al, 2004;Pound, 2002;Shackelford et al, 2002), however, was not considered in these previous critiques of human sperm competition. When considering all of the evidence of adaptations to sperm competition in men and in women, including the current research, it is reasonable to conclude that sperm competition may have been a recurrent and selectively important feature of human evolutionary history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, this does not mean that short-term mating cannot have its evolutionary rationale and advantages, both for men and women. In particular, women may find short-term mating especially useful as a strategy for resource acquisition and for optimal screening of potential mates in a longer-term perspective [3], and this may induce in turn in long-term mating-oriented men the deployment of mate retention tactics and semen-displacement practices to hedge against the risk of successful insemination of the partner by male rivals, especially if the woman is judged sexually attractive [26]. In terms of mating-relevant cues, moreover, men differentiate between (women) body-focused short-term cues and face-focused long-term ones, whereas no such differentiation exists in women's mating orientations [27].…”
Section: Sexual Strategy Theory: Sex As Evolutionary Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%