2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-011-1262-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mate quality, not aggressive spillover, explains sexual cannibalism in a size-dimorphic spider

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, when females select larger male body sizes, SSDH and MCH are not mutually exclusive (Dolomedes fimbriatus; Kralj-Fišer et al 2016). In fact, we observed that males that evaded female attacks later copulated with the same female, implying that the female attack may also serve as a mate check strategy (Nephilengys livida; Kralj-Fišer et al 2012). Females could benefit from mating with larger males because their offspring could inherit larger adult body sizes which could be advantageous in both foraging and mating contexts (Elgar 1992;Prenter et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, when females select larger male body sizes, SSDH and MCH are not mutually exclusive (Dolomedes fimbriatus; Kralj-Fišer et al 2016). In fact, we observed that males that evaded female attacks later copulated with the same female, implying that the female attack may also serve as a mate check strategy (Nephilengys livida; Kralj-Fišer et al 2012). Females could benefit from mating with larger males because their offspring could inherit larger adult body sizes which could be advantageous in both foraging and mating contexts (Elgar 1992;Prenter et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Similarly, some studies found evidence in the line of the ASH (e.g. Johnson and Sih 2005, Foellmer and Khadka 2013, Rabaneda-Bueno et al 2014, while others failed to support the latter hypothesis (see Kralj-Fišer et al 2012, 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We define polygyny as male mating with more than one female, whereas monogynous males invest into repeated mating with the same female in an attempt to plug both of her copulatory openings. We based the inferred mating rates in nephilids and outgroups (Additional file 1: Table S1) on available experimental studies [13, 3941, 48–73] and on genital damage data where single versus multiple male mating plugs per female copulatory opening predict monandry and polyandry, respectively [26, 35, 40, 41, 53]. Most Nephila species, and Phonognatha graeffei, are polyandrous [49, 61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female counter-adaptations may include modifications of female genital anatomy [10], physiological adjustments [11], and concealment of paternity [12]. Females may also engage in pre- or post-copulatory sexual cannibalism, thereby preventing unwanted copulations [1316]. The intensity of sexual conflict and thus strength of selection acting on these traits may be influenced by the potential mating rates of both males and females [2, 17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%