2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mate-guarding behaviour in anurans: intrasexual selection and the evolution of prolonged amplexus in the harlequin toad Atelopus laetissimus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clasping time is a classic indicator of sexual conflict found in myriad arthropod and vertebrate systems (Arnqvist & Rowe 2005; Johns et al 2009; Rueda-Solano et al 2022; Sigvardt et al 2017). Indeed, males of some species, including those in this study, are entirely unable to ensure copulation when unable to clasp the female, providing significant motivation for unreceptive females to prevent clasping (Machado & Macías-Ordόñez et al 2007; Myers et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clasping time is a classic indicator of sexual conflict found in myriad arthropod and vertebrate systems (Arnqvist & Rowe 2005; Johns et al 2009; Rueda-Solano et al 2022; Sigvardt et al 2017). Indeed, males of some species, including those in this study, are entirely unable to ensure copulation when unable to clasp the female, providing significant motivation for unreceptive females to prevent clasping (Machado & Macías-Ordόñez et al 2007; Myers et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to comparing the von Mises stress in each model in their long‐axis loading scenario, we also performed two further rounds of analyses that simulated the force vectors acting on the radioulna during landing (Figure S2 k–l) and amplexus (Figure S3 k–l). We retained the same vector magnitude (36 N) for all tests for the sake of comparison (although 36 N may not be an unreasonable estimate for amplexus forces in frogs; see Rueda‐Solano et al, 2022 ). For the direction of our landing vector, we generated a landing force vector based on angle measurements from previous work measuring the GRF of ranids (Nauwelaerts & Aerts, 2006 ; Reilly et al, 2016 ) as well as XROMM video data of R. catesbeiana jumping (R. Keeffe, unpublished data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We retained the same vector magnitude (36 N) for all tests for the sake of comparison (although 36 N may not be an unreasonable estimate for amplexus forces in frogs; see Rueda-Solano et al, 2022).…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%