The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1515/revneuro.2008.19.2-3.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching-to-Sample as a Model of Symbolic Behavior for Bio-behavioral Investigations

Abstract: SYNOPSISThis paper discusses the use of matching-tosample as a procedure to investigate symbolic behavior acquisition when studying the evolution of language. It is argued that generalized identity and stimulus classes formed after learning arbitrary interconnected conditional stimulus relationships may be the result of basic pre-symbolic processes. Such aspects may thus provide relevant information for interdisciplinary research on symbolic behavior and language evolution. An individualized approach when buil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain the reward, in the former task capuchins had to follow an identity rule to choose which of two comparison figures resembled most closely a stimulus presented as sample, whereas in the latter task capuchins had to simply touch a stimulus which appeared on the screen. Learning to solve Identity Matching-to-Sample tasks according to an identity rule could be a challenging problem for non-human species ( Wright et al, 1988 ; Wright, 1997 , 2001 ; Galvão et al, 2005 , 2008 ; Bodily et al, 2008 , for a review see Katz et al, 2007 ). Specifically, our monkeys underwent a long training protocol before they succeeded in generalization tests in which they succeeded in learning to solve the task in a way that extended beyond the training stimuli, thus demonstrating to rely on relational learning processes rather than on item-specific learning ( Truppa et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the reward, in the former task capuchins had to follow an identity rule to choose which of two comparison figures resembled most closely a stimulus presented as sample, whereas in the latter task capuchins had to simply touch a stimulus which appeared on the screen. Learning to solve Identity Matching-to-Sample tasks according to an identity rule could be a challenging problem for non-human species ( Wright et al, 1988 ; Wright, 1997 , 2001 ; Galvão et al, 2005 , 2008 ; Bodily et al, 2008 , for a review see Katz et al, 2007 ). Specifically, our monkeys underwent a long training protocol before they succeeded in generalization tests in which they succeeded in learning to solve the task in a way that extended beyond the training stimuli, thus demonstrating to rely on relational learning processes rather than on item-specific learning ( Truppa et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the procedures that may achieve this are three-choice MTS and the elimination of correlations between stimulus position and stimulus location (Barros, Galvão & McIlvane, 2002;Galvão et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the present study was to evaluate a procedure to assess the property of symmetry in capuchin monkeys by combining elements of the procedures reported by D'Amato et al and Velasco et al The present study was part of a research program entitled Experimental School for Primates, which is dedicated to developing stimulus control procedures and evaluating the relational capabilities of capuchin monkeys (see Barros, Galvão, & McIlvane, 2002;Galvão, Soares Filho, Barros, & Souza, 2008).…”
Section: Assessing Symmetry In Capuchin Monkeysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, matching relations within that procedure are necessary but not sufficient to define symbolic functioning (Galvão, Soares Filho, Barros, & Souza, 2008). With nonhumans, matching repertoires typically comprise a small number of stimulus-stimulus relations (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%