2008
DOI: 10.1080/09500690601152386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching Society Values: Students’ views of biotechnology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, worldwide studies have revealed that students still have knowledge limitations and negative attitudes towards biotechnology (Dawson 2007;Prokop et al 2007;Sáez et al 2008). The seeming inefficiency of the educational policies that have been implemented may be related to the fact that student populations are still poorly characterised with regards to their perceptions about biotechnology (Dawson 2007;Prokop et al 2007;Sáez et al 2008;Us ßak et al 2009). Most studies conducted over the last decade to assess public perceptions about biotechnology have focused on adult populations (Hagelin 2004;Klerck and Sweeney 2007;Pin and Gutteling 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, worldwide studies have revealed that students still have knowledge limitations and negative attitudes towards biotechnology (Dawson 2007;Prokop et al 2007;Sáez et al 2008). The seeming inefficiency of the educational policies that have been implemented may be related to the fact that student populations are still poorly characterised with regards to their perceptions about biotechnology (Dawson 2007;Prokop et al 2007;Sáez et al 2008;Us ßak et al 2009). Most studies conducted over the last decade to assess public perceptions about biotechnology have focused on adult populations (Hagelin 2004;Klerck and Sweeney 2007;Pin and Gutteling 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With the controversy surrounding biotechnology applications continuously fuelling public debate, the concerns about the public's understanding of their implications spread to the educational field, resulting in the curricular incorporation of biotechnology topics (Hanegan and Bigler 2009;Steele and Aubusson 2004) and the development of countless resources to improve students' scientific literacy (Milne and Morrison 2007;Rothhaar et al 2006). However, worldwide studies have revealed that students still have knowledge limitations and negative attitudes towards biotechnology (Dawson 2007;Prokop et al 2007;Sáez et al 2008). The seeming inefficiency of the educational policies that have been implemented may be related to the fact that student populations are still poorly characterised with regards to their perceptions about biotechnology (Dawson 2007;Prokop et al 2007;Sáez et al 2008;Us ßak et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…it is believed that school education in science, especially in biology (27,30,32), plays a major role in welcoming and likewise dealing with the multiple challenges of the new biotechnology. it is called upon to prepare and form students as responsible members of society who are able to make wellinformed decisions on the various applications of biotechnology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After their exposure to the material, the majority were able to describe both positive and negative aspects of cloning. The students perceived cloning as acceptable if the techniques were useful with regard to medicine and treatment of diseases, similar to what Calnan, Montaner and Horne (2005) and Sáez, Niño and Carretero (2008) found in their studies. Nevertheless, the majority of our students considered the cloning of animals and humans as ethically indefensible.…”
Section: Students' Interest In Cloningmentioning
confidence: 50%