2020
DOI: 10.1134/s1064226920010064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching of Radiation with Array of Planar Antennas with SINIS Bolometers in an Integrating Cavity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A sharp decrease below 220 GHz is determined by the cutoff frequency of the feeding waveguide. This corresponds to the actual configuration of our experimental setup [29,30]. The obtained spectral dependence is more complicated compared with the unit cell model with Floquet ports, and corresponds more closely to the experimental results.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling and Simulation Algorithmsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A sharp decrease below 220 GHz is determined by the cutoff frequency of the feeding waveguide. This corresponds to the actual configuration of our experimental setup [29,30]. The obtained spectral dependence is more complicated compared with the unit cell model with Floquet ports, and corresponds more closely to the experimental results.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling and Simulation Algorithmsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We studied the receiver in the form of a matrix of 5x5 ring planar antennas. The rings were cut in halves and SINIS structures were inserted into the gaps, where S is aluminum superconducting electrodes, I is an aluminum oxide tunnel barrier, N is a layer of non-superconducting aluminum with thin iron sublayer [12,13]. For direct current bias, the rings are connected in series.…”
Section: W II Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Te estimate by formula (3) already at V/VΔ~0.1 noticeably decreases, although electron cooling, whose power is an order of magnitude less than VI and does not exceed 0.05 pW, is clearly insufficient for this case. Therefore, the single-electron current of the ideal NIS junction according to formula (3) at low voltages is only a small fraction of the total current, the contribution to which can due to the subgap Andreev current In+Is [13,16]. In the case of electrons scattering by magnetic ions, as established in [16,17], In is near zero and Is can be presented as…”
Section: W II Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Такая калибровка позволяет частично " исключить" множественные переотражения внутри криостата и нагрев подложки. Особенности такой методики калибровки подробно изложены в нашей работе [16]. Мы также измерили отклик образца на излучение черного тела при температурах 6 и 9 K (рис.…”
Section: экспериментальная установка и результаты измеренийunclassified