Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2695664.2699491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching of events and activities

Abstract: I like things matching. I have an upright bass, a drum kit and a grand piano that's the same color.-Penn Jillette A B S T R A C T Nowadays, business processes are increasingly supported by IT services that produce massive amounts of event data during process execution. Aiming at a better process understanding and improvement, this event data can be used to analyze processes using process mining techniques. Process models can be automatically discovered and the execution can be checked for conformance to specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, there can be an n:m-relation between recorded events and activities [2,3], i.e., one higher level activity may create multiple low level events and one such event possibly relates to multiple activities. There are proposals for unsupervised abstraction methods that try to determine this relation based on identifying sub-sequences and machine learning methods [2,4,5,6,7], as well as proposals for supervised methods based on existing process documentation and constraint satisfaction [3,8,9,10,11]. Unsupervised abstraction methods, clearly, do not take existing knowledge into account and may fail to provide meaningful labels for discovered event clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, there can be an n:m-relation between recorded events and activities [2,3], i.e., one higher level activity may create multiple low level events and one such event possibly relates to multiple activities. There are proposals for unsupervised abstraction methods that try to determine this relation based on identifying sub-sequences and machine learning methods [2,4,5,6,7], as well as proposals for supervised methods based on existing process documentation and constraint satisfaction [3,8,9,10,11]. Unsupervised abstraction methods, clearly, do not take existing knowledge into account and may fail to provide meaningful labels for discovered event clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised abstraction methods, clearly, do not take existing knowledge into account and may fail to provide meaningful labels for discovered event clusters. Existing supervised abstraction methods [3,8,9,10,11] assume knowledge about a single model for the overall process. They resolve to clustering methods and heuristics when challenged with event logs from processes that feature n:m event-activity relations, concurrent activities, and noise (i.e., erroneous or missing events).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods developed by (Baier et. al., 2015;Baier, 2015;Baier et al, 2014) assume the knowledge of a single highlevel model for the overall process.…”
Section: Domain Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods developed by (Baier et. al., 2015;Baier, 2015;Baier et al, 2014) assume the knowledge of a single highlevel model for the overall process. The goal is to automatically discover the relation between events and activities.…”
Section: Domain Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is limited to traces of length less than 30 events due to the computational complexity. Most related to our work are the methods developed by Baier et al [3,42,43]. Again, the methods assume knowledge about a single high-level model for the overall process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%