2012
DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2012.2083.2097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching Lsi for Scalable Information Retrieval

Abstract: Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) is one of the well-liked techniques in the information retrieval fields. Different from the traditional information retrieval techniques, LSI is not based on the keyword matching simply. It uses statistics and algebraic computations. Based on Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), the higher dimensional matrix is converted to a lower dimensional approximate matrix, of which the noises could be filtered. And also the issues of synonymy and polysemy in the traditional techniques can b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such large matrix leads to the problem of high and inefficient computation and increases the difficulty in detecting the relationships among terms (synonymy). To overcome these problems, linear feature extraction techniques could be applied during the preprocessing phase, such as Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), Locality Preserving Indexing (LPI), Independent Component Analysis (ICA) or Random Projection (RP) (Han and Kamber, 2011;Palsonkennedy and Gopal, 2012;Tang et al, 2005;Thangamani and Thangaraj, 2010).…”
Section: Dimensional Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such large matrix leads to the problem of high and inefficient computation and increases the difficulty in detecting the relationships among terms (synonymy). To overcome these problems, linear feature extraction techniques could be applied during the preprocessing phase, such as Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), Locality Preserving Indexing (LPI), Independent Component Analysis (ICA) or Random Projection (RP) (Han and Kamber, 2011;Palsonkennedy and Gopal, 2012;Tang et al, 2005;Thangamani and Thangaraj, 2010).…”
Section: Dimensional Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%