2006
DOI: 10.1007/11836025_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching Large Scale Ontology Effectively

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ontologies containing tens of thousands of subsumption relations (as AGROVOC and NALT) this type of constraint can lead to the creation of blocks with badly distributed sizes, unusable for alignment. However, this technique is used by the MOM system to align (theoretically) large ontologies, but the tests presented in [15] are only applied on ontologies of less than 700 concepts.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ontologies containing tens of thousands of subsumption relations (as AGROVOC and NALT) this type of constraint can lead to the creation of blocks with badly distributed sizes, unusable for alignment. However, this technique is used by the MOM system to align (theoretically) large ontologies, but the tests presented in [15] are only applied on ontologies of less than 700 concepts.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of previous OAEI contests 1 show that more than half of the matching systems couldn't match large ontologies in less than one hour [12]. Consequently, several approaches have been proposed to address the problem of matching two large schemas, such as MOM [20], COMA++ [6] and Falcon [11]. As we will further discuss in Section 2, the current approaches to partition-based matching have several limitations and the design space for such solutions has not yet sufficiently been explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%