2016
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-719070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching for the nonconventional MHC-I MICA gene significantly reduces the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD

Abstract: Key Points• Matching for MICA significantly reduces the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD in otherwise HLA 10/ 10-matched unrelated-donor HCT.• Our results formally define MICA as a novel major histocompatibility complex-encoded human transplantation antigen.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
2
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
58
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Although Anderson et al have questioned this relationship, the recent report of Carapito et al conclusively confirmed this association. 33,34 We also saw higher rates of aGVHD in patients mismatched for MICA-129. However, Carapito et al also described a higher risk for cGVHD and a lower relapse rate in MICA mismatched cases, which we could not confirm for MICA-129 mismatched cases.…”
Section: Org Frommentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10 Although Anderson et al have questioned this relationship, the recent report of Carapito et al conclusively confirmed this association. 33,34 We also saw higher rates of aGVHD in patients mismatched for MICA-129. However, Carapito et al also described a higher risk for cGVHD and a lower relapse rate in MICA mismatched cases, which we could not confirm for MICA-129 mismatched cases.…”
Section: Org Frommentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, Carapito et al also described a higher risk for cGVHD and a lower relapse rate in MICA mismatched cases, which we could not confirm for MICA-129 mismatched cases. 34 We therefore speculate that an impaired NK-alloreactivity in the subgroup of MICA 1 MICA-129 mismatched cases, as opposed to MICA-mismatched 1 MICA-129 matched patients, may account for this difference. Carapito et al also analyzed matching for MICA-129 and saw no differences for all end points.…”
Section: Org Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that when HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 or DQB1-mismatched donors are available, additional testing of DRB3/4/5 may help to lower risks. Most recently, mismatching for the non-classical class I gene, MICA, has been shown to impact GVHD and survival in some [6,7], but not other, studies [8]. …”
Section: Patient-donor Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Кроме того, целесообразно учитывать уже известные минорные антигены, кото-рые также могут оказывать влияние на течение РТПХ. Так, в исследовании результатов алло-ТГСК (n = 922) от полностью (10/10) HLA-совместимых неродствен-ных доноров (R. Carapito et al, 2016) идентифициро-ван антиген MICA (MHC class I chain-related gene A), несовместимость по которому (n = 113) увеличивала риск острой (III-IV степени) и хронической РТПХ, а также смертности, не связанной с рецидивом, соот-ветственно в 1,83, 1,5 и 1,35 раза [97]. В то же время у пациентов с MICA-несовместимостью было отмече-но уменьшение риска рецидива при 6-летней медиане наблюдения (10,2 % против 18,3 %).…”
Section: гаплоидентичная трансплантация и профилактика реакции «трансunclassified