2022
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202270005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching Charge Extraction Contact for Infrared PbS Colloidal Quantum Dot Solar Cells (Small 1/2022)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4f) were then employed to investigate the dynamics of charge carriers of these two kinds of devices. 45,46 The PbS-FLC devices exhibited a shorter carrier extraction time (t TPC ) of 0.37 ms and a longer recombination time (t TPV ) of 4.10 ms. In contrast, the t TPC and t TPV values of the control devices are 0.71 ms and 2.02 ms, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4f) were then employed to investigate the dynamics of charge carriers of these two kinds of devices. 45,46 The PbS-FLC devices exhibited a shorter carrier extraction time (t TPC ) of 0.37 ms and a longer recombination time (t TPV ) of 4.10 ms. In contrast, the t TPC and t TPV values of the control devices are 0.71 ms and 2.02 ms, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ] The recent achievements of surface passivation, interface modulation, and device architecture have led to improved CQD solar cell performance, and enabled power conversion efficiencies (PCE) above 13% for lead sulfide (PbS) CQDs. [ 2 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%