Matching barriers and facilitators to implementation strategies: recommendations for community settings

Abstract

Background Implementation science aims to improve the integration of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. While its methods and models could potentially apply to any field with evidence-based interventions, most research thus far has originated in clinical settings. Community settings often have fewer resources, missions beyond health, and a lack of support and expertise to implement evidence-based interventions when compared to many clinical settings. Thus, selecting and tailoring implementation strategies in community settings is particularly challenging, as existing compilations are primarily operationalized through clinical setting terminology. In this debate, we (1) share the process of using an existing match tool to select implementation strategies to increase uptake of nutrition and physical activity policy, systems, and environment interventions in community settings and (2) discuss the challenges of this process to argue that selecting implementation strategies in community settings has limited transferability from clinical settings and may require a unique implementation strategy compilation and pragmatic matching tool. Matching barriers to implementation strategies The impetus for this debate paper came from our work selecting implementation strategies to improve the implementation and eventual scaling of nutrition and physical activity policy, systems, and environment interventions in a community settings. We conducted focus groups with practitioners and used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change match tool to select potential implementation strategies to overcome prominent barriers. There was limited congruence between tool outputs and optimal strategies, which may in part be due to differences in context between clinical and community settings. Based on this, we outline needs and recommendations for developing a novel and pragmatic matching tool for researchers and practitioners in community settings. Conclusions More work is needed to refine the implementation barrier-strategy matching process to ensure it is relevant, rapid, and rigorous. As leading implementation strategy scholars note, as more researchers document contextual factors and strategies selected to address them, the knowledge base will increase, and refined mapping processes can emerge.

Strategies for scaling up pre-ART advanced HIV disease screening at a secondary referral hospital - Malawi: a qualitative study

“…Most of the facility level barriers identi ed were consistent with those reported in other studies that evaluated health related interventions or assessed facility readiness to implement AHD rapid diagnostic and screening tests [34,36,37], hence needed blended strategies that target multiple points in the screening process. For instance, inconsistencies in AHD screening as a result to inadequate knowledge and non-adherence to guidelines require strategies such as on-going trainings, combined with team building, and collaborative learning approaches that maximizes the impact [38], [39] .…”

Getting cozy with causality: Advances to the causal pathway diagramming method to enhance implementation precision

“…Implementation strategies are theorized to work well when carefully matched to targeted determinants, including barriers and facilitators, and when factors that influence strategy effectiveness—such as preconditions and moderators—are prospectively identified and addressed. Yet, selecting a strategy appropriate for a specific determinant within a given setting remains a vexing problem in implementation practice and research ( Balis & Houghtaling, 2023 ). The field is lacking in theory and empirical evidence that informs which implementation strategies are capable of addressing specific barriers and facilitators ( Wang et al, 2023 ).…”

A streamlined approach to classifying and tailoring implementation strategies: recommendations to speed the translation of research to practice

“…The ability to optimize implementation across contextual and temporal variations in determinants will require a more rapid and pragmatic approach to strategy tailoring. Balis and Houghtaling (2023) illustrate the challenge, by describing the difficulties experienced in their efforts to tailor strategies to implement nutrition and physical activity policy, systems, and environmental change interventions [ 12 ].…”