2019
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1605239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of bosutinib, dasatinib and nilotinib effect on survival and major cytogenetic response in treatment of second-line chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinicians therefore can tailor their choice of treatment to the individual needs of the specific patient. The results of the current report are similar to those from a previous MAIC confirming a similarity in the efficacy of short-term endpoints for bosutinib, dasatinib and nilotinib in second-line CP-CML 23 . These analyses showed that when dasatinib was compared with bosutinib in terms of MCyR, the result was a non-significant OR of 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.53-1.16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Clinicians therefore can tailor their choice of treatment to the individual needs of the specific patient. The results of the current report are similar to those from a previous MAIC confirming a similarity in the efficacy of short-term endpoints for bosutinib, dasatinib and nilotinib in second-line CP-CML 23 . These analyses showed that when dasatinib was compared with bosutinib in terms of MCyR, the result was a non-significant OR of 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.53-1.16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…When tested in vivo, dasatinib reduced synovial inflammation, cartilage destruction and bone erosion, while bosutinib was ineffective in controlling any of the in vivo or histopathological signs of arthritis. This difference of the two TKIs could be attributed to their differential mode of action [47][48][49]. Among their differences, it is worth mentioning that dasatinib, has the potential to target KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) [50], as well as collagen receptor tyrosine kinases discoidin domain receptors 1 and 2 (DDR1, 2) [51], PI3K and ERK, potential targets for the treatment of RA [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When tested in vivo, dasatinib reduced synovial in ammation, cartilage destruction and bone erosion, while bosutinib was ineffective in controlling any of the in vivo or histopathological signs of arthritis. This difference of the two TKIs could be attributed to their differential mode of action (44)(45)(46). Among their differences, it is worth mentioning that dasatinib, has the potential to target KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) (47), as well as collagen receptor tyrosine kinases discoidin domain receptors 1 and 2 (DDR1, 2) (48), PI3K and ERK, potential targets for the treatment of RA (49,50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%