2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matched-pair analysis of a multi-institutional cohort reveals that epidermal growth factor receptor mutation is not a risk factor for postoperative recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we excluded patients with pure GGO and LPA in the survival analysis aimed to eliminate the bias caused by the excellent prognosis of patients with pure GGO and LPA. Our present study showed that EGFR mutation was not correlated with RFS in the entire cohort and the subgroups classified by clinicopathologic characteristics and radiologic component, which was similar to the research results of Matsumura et al (17) and Lin et al (14), whose studies also focused on the small lung adenocarcinoma and excluded the influence of TKI therapy. In addition, Ohba et al (18) and colleagues found that EGFR mutation was not a prognostic factor in resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we excluded patients with pure GGO and LPA in the survival analysis aimed to eliminate the bias caused by the excellent prognosis of patients with pure GGO and LPA. Our present study showed that EGFR mutation was not correlated with RFS in the entire cohort and the subgroups classified by clinicopathologic characteristics and radiologic component, which was similar to the research results of Matsumura et al (17) and Lin et al (14), whose studies also focused on the small lung adenocarcinoma and excluded the influence of TKI therapy. In addition, Ohba et al (18) and colleagues found that EGFR mutation was not a prognostic factor in resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several previous studies demonstrated that the status of EGFR mutation could predict the prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma patients (5,(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). In contrast, some studies revealed that EGFR mutation was not a risk factor for postoperative recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma (3,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Besides, most previous studies either did not consider the pathologic stage and pathologic tumor size, or did not exclude the influence of its histologic subtype, radiologic characteristics and TKIs therapy (21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study was a subset analysis of a multiinstitutional retrospective cohort study to investigate the prevalence and prognosis of adenocarcinoma with or without EGFR mutations [18]. The study population comprised patients who underwent complete surgical resection for lung adenocarcinoma between January 2005 and December 2012 and whose EGFR mutations were examined at five institutions: Fukushima Medical University, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Miyagi Cancer Center, Tohoku University, and Kanazawa Medical University.…”
Section: Study Design and Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are limited data reporting that EGFR mutation is a negative prognostic factor. In fact, most of the previous studies reported that EGFR mutation is not a prognostic factor, 1,11,12 and some studies reported that EGFR mutation was a favourable prognostic factor 2,13 . However, these previous studies did not consider histological grading 1,2,12,13 or used the IASLC/ATS/ERS histological classification, 11,14 which might be less sensitive compared to the IASLC grading system, to predict clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%