2015
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matched Case-control Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Pylorus-preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Periampullary Tumors

Abstract: L-PPPD had the typical advantages of minimally invasive abdominal procedures, such as less pain, shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery. It is technically safe and feasible, and has favorable oncologic outcomes in comparison with O-PPPD in patients with periampullary tumors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
163
4
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
12
163
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies suggest the minimally invasive approach is not only feasible but equivalently efficacious and safe: with similar perioperative morbidity and mortality (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). In particular, the minimally invasive approach to distal pancreatectomy has been widely accepted and clearly demonstrated advantages such as reduced blood loss, reduced overall complication rate, reduced surgical site infection and shorter hospital length of stay (7)(8)(9)(10)17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies suggest the minimally invasive approach is not only feasible but equivalently efficacious and safe: with similar perioperative morbidity and mortality (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). In particular, the minimally invasive approach to distal pancreatectomy has been widely accepted and clearly demonstrated advantages such as reduced blood loss, reduced overall complication rate, reduced surgical site infection and shorter hospital length of stay (7)(8)(9)(10)17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laparoscopy, particularly in the setting of benign disease, is being increasingly utilized for pancreatic surgery. Limited pancreatectomy (pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy), for example, when performed by experienced surgeons has been demonstrated to be safe, produce similar outcomes at equal or lesser cost, and lead to decreased length of hospital stay when compared to open pancreatectomy (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). The generalization of these findings to TP appears appropriate (as one of the most technically challenging hurdles in pancreaticoduodenectomy, the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, is eliminated in TP) and is now being utilized in select centers.…”
Section: Original Article On Pancreatic Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As operative techniques and peri-operative outcomes continue to improve, optimizing the eligibility criteria for resection is of great interest. 6,8 Furthermore, due to limited survival times, identifying those patients who do not benefit from a resection is equally important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, several single institution series reported on the safety and feasibility of TLP in the setting of several benign and malignant pancreatic pathologies (2)(3)(4). The available literature mainly focuses on two key aspects of TLP, one being the learning curve necessary to master the procedure and the other being the comparison of overall outcomes between TLP and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) (5)(6)(7). The numerous studies that have focused on TLP learning curve have identified at least three phases: a slow difficult beginning, followed by a rapid improvement that culminates in a plateau phase characterized by a slow but continuous improvement (5)(6)(7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available literature mainly focuses on two key aspects of TLP, one being the learning curve necessary to master the procedure and the other being the comparison of overall outcomes between TLP and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) (5)(6)(7). The numerous studies that have focused on TLP learning curve have identified at least three phases: a slow difficult beginning, followed by a rapid improvement that culminates in a plateau phase characterized by a slow but continuous improvement (5)(6)(7). Moreover, most studies comparing TLP to OPD suggest that when TLP is performed in center of expertise the oncologic outcome, the complication rate, and the mortality rate are similar to OPD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%