2012
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Match and mismatch: conservation physiology, nutritional ecology and the timescales of biological adaptation

Abstract: Conservation physiology (CP) and nutritional ecology (NE) are both integrative sciences that share the fundamental aim of understanding the patterns, mechanisms and consequences of animal responses to changing environments. Here, we explore the high-level similarities and differences between CP and NE, identifying as central themes to both fields the multiple timescales over which animals adapt (and fail to adapt) to their environments, and the need for integrative models to study these processes. At one extre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
168
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many ecologically relevant contexts, the abundance of food resources in the environment can drive the self-assembly of individuals into groups (Raubenheimer et al, 2012). A simple example can be found in cellular slime molds (Dictyostelium discoideum), where nutrient availability determines whether the cells forage independently or aggregate into a slug-like mass that moves as a multi-cellular fruiting body to produce spores (Gregor et al, 2010).…”
Section: At the Intersection Of Foraging And Social Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many ecologically relevant contexts, the abundance of food resources in the environment can drive the self-assembly of individuals into groups (Raubenheimer et al, 2012). A simple example can be found in cellular slime molds (Dictyostelium discoideum), where nutrient availability determines whether the cells forage independently or aggregate into a slug-like mass that moves as a multi-cellular fruiting body to produce spores (Gregor et al, 2010).…”
Section: At the Intersection Of Foraging And Social Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maternal advantages (or disadvantages) in affecting offspring phenotype, for example, should also be considered (Marshall and Uller, 2007), and the level of prediction between maternal and offspring environments should be measured (Burgess and Marshall, 2011;Raubenheimer et al, 2012;Uller et al, 2013).…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for a physiologically based, mechanistic understanding of the impacts of environmental change in species conservation is becoming increasingly recognized (Seebacher and Franklin, 2012;Stevenson et al, 2005;Wikelski and Cooke, 2006), and the field of vertebrate eco-physiology has grown rapidly in the past decade (e.g. Blaustein et al, 2012;Cooke et al, 2012;Klaassen et al, 2012;Raubenheimer et al, 2012). To accurately predict the physiological impacts of temperature variation on amphibians in situ, we need a better understanding of the distinct effects of variable weather patterns versus changes in absolute temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%