2019
DOI: 10.14295/bds.2019.v22i3.1759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Masticatory force and electromyographic activity of the mandibular elevators muscles in different rehabilitation treatments.

Abstract: The masticatory function is one of the most complex neuropsychological mechanisms in human motor performance and it depends on several factors, such as bite force, muscle coordination, morphology, and number of teeth in occlusion. Purpose: to evaluate the influence of different rehabilitation treatments such as complete and partial dentures, masticatory forces, and the dynamics of mandibular elevator muscles. Material and Methods: the maximum bite force (force transducer) and electrical activity (superficial e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous results reflected the significant effect of the flat splint and anterior repositioning splint in increasing the EMG activities of masseter and temporalis muscles more than that of behavior therapy and low level laser therapy EMG values presents variability due to differences in: electrodes position, muscle anatomy, width of subcutaneous tissue between electrode and muscle, and facial morphology (36,37) . So the differences between this study and others may be due to the difference in the methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The previous results reflected the significant effect of the flat splint and anterior repositioning splint in increasing the EMG activities of masseter and temporalis muscles more than that of behavior therapy and low level laser therapy EMG values presents variability due to differences in: electrodes position, muscle anatomy, width of subcutaneous tissue between electrode and muscle, and facial morphology (36,37) . So the differences between this study and others may be due to the difference in the methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…19 Peeran et al mention that during the maximum voluntary contraction of the masseter muscle, the force was 231.93 N on the right side and 230.60 N on the left side with old complete dentures and 163.13 N on the right side and 171.73 N on the left side with new complete dentures after 5 months of follow-up. 20,21 The difference between the old and new complete dentures with respect to the activity of the masseter muscle on the right and left sides was 68.8 N and 58.8 N, respectively. Hence, it was inferred from these values that the right-side masseter muscle was more efficient than the left.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%