2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mastication of crisp bread: Role of bread texture and structure on texture perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study performed with 16 healthy subjects (eight females and eight males aged between 16–60 years) indicated a number of cycles and chewing time between 28 and 46 and 17 and 30 s, respectively, during the oral digestion of other cereal products (toast and cake) . However, our results are higher than those reported in a study performed with 14 healthy subjects (10 females and 4 males aged between 24 and 37) masticating WWB (13–20 number of chewing cycles and 11.0–16.7 s for chewing time) and white bread (11–17 number of cycles and 11.8–17.8 s for chewing time), as well as in the study carried out by Motoi et al with white bread (25 cycles and chewing time of 15.3 s) in 12 healthy subjects (seven females and five males aged between 20–29). In addition, the larger number of cycles and mastication time for the WRB in our study can be due to the fact that larger times are needed to obtain an adequate particle size of the oral bolus to be swallowed.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study performed with 16 healthy subjects (eight females and eight males aged between 16–60 years) indicated a number of cycles and chewing time between 28 and 46 and 17 and 30 s, respectively, during the oral digestion of other cereal products (toast and cake) . However, our results are higher than those reported in a study performed with 14 healthy subjects (10 females and 4 males aged between 24 and 37) masticating WWB (13–20 number of chewing cycles and 11.0–16.7 s for chewing time) and white bread (11–17 number of cycles and 11.8–17.8 s for chewing time), as well as in the study carried out by Motoi et al with white bread (25 cycles and chewing time of 15.3 s) in 12 healthy subjects (seven females and five males aged between 20–29). In addition, the larger number of cycles and mastication time for the WRB in our study can be due to the fact that larger times are needed to obtain an adequate particle size of the oral bolus to be swallowed.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…In this regard, the influence of different parameters of an in vitro oral and gastric digestion (non-INFOGEST) was evaluated to determine the rate of bread breakdown during digestion in different types of bread (white, wheat, rye, barley, and almond-wheat) . Furthermore, an oral phase with human chewing for WRB, wholemeal wheat bread (WWB), and white bread has been evaluated, although for assessing parameters of the oral phase. According to the INFOGEST protocol for solid and starchy foods, an oral phase including α-amylase must be carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human preference in bread texture is closely associated with the texture parameters of bread (hardness, cohesiveness and gumminess) measured using an instrument. High hardness and gumminess imply a higher force needed to break bread during mastication and high cohesiveness a high internal strength of crumb (Aleixandre et al., 2021), resulting in negative effects on the liking score of bread crumb softness (Feili et al., 2013). The high hardness and gumminess of the Alu100 bread shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the determination of texture analysis, as bread test samples, 1 or 2 slices of 12.5 mm thickness were cut from one end of each bread sample, and then, 3 slices of 15 mm thickness were cut out in turn. A twice‐compression method was chosen using the following parameters: probe P/36R, strain 70%, force 8 g and compression 1.0 mm s −1 (Aleixandre et al ., 2021). The texture analysis (hardness, springiness, chewiness and cohesiveness) of bread during bread ageing was also according to the above‐mentioned process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%