2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40616-018-0106-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mastery of Echoics in Chinese Establishes Bidirectional Naming in Chinese for Preschoolers with Naming in English

Abstract: The onset of the verbal behavior developmental cusp of bidirectional naming (BiN) in a second language makes it possible for monolingual English-speaking children to learn names of things in a second language incidentally. We conducted 2 experiments to identify why monolingual English-speaking children cannot demonstrate BiN in another language when they demonstrated BiN in their native language. In Experiment I, using a group design (n = 32 preschoolers), we identified Chinese speech sounds that monolingual E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, these results have been replicated across children with different disabilities (e.g., learning delays and developmental disabilities, Greer et al, ; autism, Fiorile & Greer, ; Olaff et al, ), typically developing children (Gilic & Greer, ), very young (i.e., 2‐year‐old) children (Gilic & Greer, ), children with varying numbers of prerequisite BiN skills (e.g., echoics, tacts, and listener behavior), and children with extremely limited vocal–verbal repertoires (Fiorile & Greer, ). Despite different procedural manipulations such as echoic training during MTS instruction (Cao & Greer, ; Hawkins, Kingsdorf, Charnock, Szabo, & Gautreaux, ; Olaff et al, ) or matching without echoic training (Gilic & Greer, ), results show that BiN did not emerge until after MEI was implemented. Studies have also compared MEI to single‐exemplar instruction (SEI; e.g., Greer et al, ), which consists of targeting a single verbal operant at a time and teaching other verbal operants separately and sequentially via a series of simple discrimination contingencies (Green, ).…”
Section: Application and Significance Of Meimentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Notably, these results have been replicated across children with different disabilities (e.g., learning delays and developmental disabilities, Greer et al, ; autism, Fiorile & Greer, ; Olaff et al, ), typically developing children (Gilic & Greer, ), very young (i.e., 2‐year‐old) children (Gilic & Greer, ), children with varying numbers of prerequisite BiN skills (e.g., echoics, tacts, and listener behavior), and children with extremely limited vocal–verbal repertoires (Fiorile & Greer, ). Despite different procedural manipulations such as echoic training during MTS instruction (Cao & Greer, ; Hawkins, Kingsdorf, Charnock, Szabo, & Gautreaux, ; Olaff et al, ) or matching without echoic training (Gilic & Greer, ), results show that BiN did not emerge until after MEI was implemented. Studies have also compared MEI to single‐exemplar instruction (SEI; e.g., Greer et al, ), which consists of targeting a single verbal operant at a time and teaching other verbal operants separately and sequentially via a series of simple discrimination contingencies (Green, ).…”
Section: Application and Significance Of Meimentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is difficult to determine the specific importance of the clarification of an S D as a conditioned reinforcer for observing responses (e.g., Cao & Greer, 2019;Longano & Greer, 2015). It is possible that establishing the word sound and the visual stimulus relevant to a particular tact as conditioned reinforcers will strengthen not only the potential observing responses but also the discriminative control by those stimuli over other behavior (e.g., echoics and tacts).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several behavior-analytic studies have evaluated the efficacy of different procedures to teach rudiments of a second language to typically developing children (e.g., Cao & Greer, 2019;Davidson & O'Connor, 2019;Dounavi, 2011;May, Downs, Marchant, & Dymond, 2016;Petursdottir & Haflidadóttir, 2009;Petursdottir, Ólafsdóttir, & Aradóttir, 2008;Rosales, Rehfeldt, & Huffman, 2012;Rosales, Rehfeldt, & Lovett, 2011) and adults (e.g. Dounavi, 2013;Rocha e Silva & Ferster, 1966).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%