1921
DOI: 10.2307/3753297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massospora cicadina Peck: A Fungous Parasite of the Periodical Cicada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1929
1929
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dome-shaped' conidia [or hypha1 bodies] developed on the ends of some of the hyphae are in most respects similar to those of Empusa and its allies, except that they are apparently not shot off with such violence; in Massospora cicadina Peck, however, there is a close parallel, for the conidia are liberated in the body of the subterranean stages of the insect host, as they are in the fluid and ,semi-fluid tissues of mackerel, and the radial germination of the conidia in the insect is also very similar. Azygospores are produced by bu9.s from hypha1 bodies into which the protoplasm flows (Speare, 1921); a tentative analogy to this may be made by comparing the bud-like omgrowth of protoplasm from the emptied ,parene hypha (sometimes growing from a hypha1 body) which 'C precedes the production of ch1amydospores(see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionand Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dome-shaped' conidia [or hypha1 bodies] developed on the ends of some of the hyphae are in most respects similar to those of Empusa and its allies, except that they are apparently not shot off with such violence; in Massospora cicadina Peck, however, there is a close parallel, for the conidia are liberated in the body of the subterranean stages of the insect host, as they are in the fluid and ,semi-fluid tissues of mackerel, and the radial germination of the conidia in the insect is also very similar. Azygospores are produced by bu9.s from hypha1 bodies into which the protoplasm flows (Speare, 1921); a tentative analogy to this may be made by comparing the bud-like omgrowth of protoplasm from the emptied ,parene hypha (sometimes growing from a hypha1 body) which 'C precedes the production of ch1amydospores(see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionand Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycosis follows a predictable phenology. Early in a periodical cicada emergence, “Stage I” infected cicadas produce haploid conidiospores capable of infecting other actively chorusing adult cicadas 1618 . Later in the emergence, “Stage II” cicadas infected by conidiospores produce diploid resting spores that fall to the soil and complete the fungal life cycle by infecting the next generation of cicada nymphs due to emerge 13 or 17 years later 18,19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massospora clearly modifies cicada phenotypes in ways contrary to the cicadas’ interests. Both Stage I and Stage II infections cause distention and loss of the terminal abdominal segments, genitalia included, in both sexes 1618 ; the breached abdomen exposes infective spores and allows their dispersal (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Massospora spp. is elegant predators of cicadas [3]. They lie in the soil as resting spores for as much as 17 years before infecting emerging cicada nymphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%