The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.98.045007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massless spin-2 field in de Sitter space

Abstract: In this paper, admitting a de Sitter (dS)-invariant vacuum in an indefinite inner product space, we present a Gupta-Bleuler type setting for causal and full dS-covariant quantization of free "massless" spin-2 field in dS spacetime. The term "massless" stands for the fact that the field displays gauge and conformal invariance properties. In this construction, the field is defined rigorously as an operatorvalued distribution. It is covariant in the usual strong sense: U g K(X)U −1 g = K(g.X), for any g in the dS… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our aim in the present work, instead, will be to point out a potential relevance between the observable smallness of the cosmological constant and a choice of vacuum in the dS gravitational background of * bamba@sss.fukushima-u.ac.jp † Enayati@iauctb.ac.ir ‡ s.rahbardehghan@iauctb.ac.ir our expanding Universe, now known as the KGB vacuum. This vacuum, based on a new representation of the canonical commutation relations, was recently proposed as an alternative to the dS natural vacuum state (the Bunch-Davies state) that yields a fully covariant and coordinate-independent quantization (the KGB quantization) of linearized gravity in dS space [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. [Due to the lack of the natural dS-invariant vacuum state for free gravitons, the fact that is now widely accepted in the physics community (see, for instance, [7,13,14]), the usual canonical quantization seems to break down for field theory of dS quantum gravity.]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim in the present work, instead, will be to point out a potential relevance between the observable smallness of the cosmological constant and a choice of vacuum in the dS gravitational background of * bamba@sss.fukushima-u.ac.jp † Enayati@iauctb.ac.ir ‡ s.rahbardehghan@iauctb.ac.ir our expanding Universe, now known as the KGB vacuum. This vacuum, based on a new representation of the canonical commutation relations, was recently proposed as an alternative to the dS natural vacuum state (the Bunch-Davies state) that yields a fully covariant and coordinate-independent quantization (the KGB quantization) of linearized gravity in dS space [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. [Due to the lack of the natural dS-invariant vacuum state for free gravitons, the fact that is now widely accepted in the physics community (see, for instance, [7,13,14]), the usual canonical quantization seems to break down for field theory of dS quantum gravity.]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KGB quantization scheme, possessing a rigorous group theoretical content which provides a well-defined meaning of massive and massless dS fields (see [34] and references therein), is a new canonical quantization method based on weaker conditions, which do not prohibit negative norm states in the definition of the field. In this sense, it provides a unified framework to treat gauge and gauge-like quantum field theories in dS space (see [26,40] and references therein). In the KGB context, despite the presence of negative norm sates in the theory, the energy operator is positive in all physical states, and vanishes in the vacuum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting the above recurrence formula into the field equation (14) and writing the tensors φ and K in a completely dS-invariant manner in terms of K (see the details in [8]), the tensor field K reads…”
Section: A Total Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Note that, we here follow a similar procedure to what we have done in Ref. [8] in order to solve the field equation (14). 11 The bivector W 1 is transverse, therefore we have ∂ · W 1 =∂ · W 1 .…”
Section: Graviton Two-point Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%