2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massively parallel numerical simulation using up to 36,000 CPU cores of an industrial-scale polydispersed reactive pressurized fluidized bed with a mesh of one billion cells

Abstract: Massively parallel numerical simulation using up to 36,000 CPU cores of an industrial-scale polydispersed reactive pressurized fluidized bed with a mesh of one billion cells. (2020) Powder Technology, 366. 906-924. ISSN 00325910 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical modeling of processes at laboratory, pilot and industrial scales by N-Euler CFD modeling approaches (such as NEPTUNE_CFD) are becoming powerful tools to support optimization or scaling-up of polymerization processes [133]- [136] and the development of new processes based on innovative concepts. [137] Despite the usefulness of such models, there are clear limitations with respect to the correct description of the hydrodynamics (mixing and segregation of solids) of multiphase flows, and the proper modeling of reactor hydrodynamics is still in its infancy. A recent review on modeling of gas phase reactors for ethylene polymerization made it clear that the models that one finds in the literature are necessarily simplified because otherwise they cannot be solved in a reasonable timeframe.…”
Section: Reactor Fluid Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical modeling of processes at laboratory, pilot and industrial scales by N-Euler CFD modeling approaches (such as NEPTUNE_CFD) are becoming powerful tools to support optimization or scaling-up of polymerization processes [133]- [136] and the development of new processes based on innovative concepts. [137] Despite the usefulness of such models, there are clear limitations with respect to the correct description of the hydrodynamics (mixing and segregation of solids) of multiphase flows, and the proper modeling of reactor hydrodynamics is still in its infancy. A recent review on modeling of gas phase reactors for ethylene polymerization made it clear that the models that one finds in the literature are necessarily simplified because otherwise they cannot be solved in a reasonable timeframe.…”
Section: Reactor Fluid Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just for curiosity, up to authors’ best knowledge the biggest computational effort for CFD applied to a fluidized bed reactor was recently reported by Neau et al., [ 141 ] who employed 36 000 CPU cores, a mesh composed of a billion element and 15 millions of CPU hours to simulate an industrial scale FBR with a 3D geometry. Even though the calculation produced 200 TB of data, the simulated physical time was no longer than 25 s.…”
Section: Macroscale Modeling With Computational Fluid Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This software is a multiphase flow solver developed in the framework of the NEPTUNE project, financially supported by CEA, EDF, IRSN and Framatome. The numerical solver has been developed for High Performance Computing [24][25][26]. The transport equations are derived by phase ensemble averaging for the continuous phase and in the framework of the kinetic theory of granular flows [27] for the dispersed phase but extended in order to take into account the interstitial fluid effects and particles-turbulence interactions [28,29].…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%