2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10086-016-1570-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive wood material for sustainable building design: the Massiv–Holz–Mauer wall system

Abstract: In this study, the emissions to air produced using massive wood material in manufacturing of a Massiv-Holz-Mauer (MHM) wall system have been assessed. The results have been compared with a traditional brick wall. The sustainability of materials was determined using the following impact categories: global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion potential (ODP), photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP) and human toxicity potential (HTP). Using wood material in building design can reduce the environmental i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From an ecological point of view, usage of wooden structures has been found to contribute to improved energy efficiency both in component manufacturing and on-site construction especially when building very high-rise buildings (Van de Kuilen et al 2011). Similarly, MSWB improves energy efficiency also at the usage of the phase of buildings abreast with carbon storage properties (Espinoza et al 2016, Santi et al 2016. However, the life-cycle impact of MSWB is largely dependent on building solutions, which either support or hinder construction and demolition waste management, for example (Dahlbo et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an ecological point of view, usage of wooden structures has been found to contribute to improved energy efficiency both in component manufacturing and on-site construction especially when building very high-rise buildings (Van de Kuilen et al 2011). Similarly, MSWB improves energy efficiency also at the usage of the phase of buildings abreast with carbon storage properties (Espinoza et al 2016, Santi et al 2016. However, the life-cycle impact of MSWB is largely dependent on building solutions, which either support or hinder construction and demolition waste management, for example (Dahlbo et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Very low in production energy compared to other building materials such as concrete, steel, and aluminum (Santi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further consensus with these authors can be observed when deciding that the walls of the building construction systems have a significant impact on the overall environmental and economic footprint of the building in terms of the materials used. Santi et al [72] also studied the environmental effects of the production of the wooden construction system and the traditional masonry construction system. These authors have arrived at similar findings to us, from which it follows that the constructional system is considerably more beneficial than the traditional construction system in terms of the evaluated parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%