2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive stars in massive clusters – IV. Disruption of clouds by momentum-driven winds

Abstract: We examine the effect of momentum-driven OB-star stellar winds on a parameter space of simulated turbulent Giant Molecular Clouds using SPH hydrodynamical simulations. By comparison with identical simulations in which ionizing radiation was included instead of winds, we show that momentum-driven winds are considerably less effective in disrupting their host clouds than are HII regions. The wind bubbles produced are smaller and generally smoother than the corresponding ionizationdriven bubbles. Winds are roughl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limits the ability of SPH to capture the low but continuous mass-loss rate from massive stars, unless the mass resolution is very much better than in our whole galaxy simulations (see e.g. Dale et al 2013). In other words, it is much more difficult to obtain a resolved and converged evolution of stellar winds using SPH as opposed to in an Eulerian grid-based code that in principle has infinite mass resolution (albeit coupled with finite spatial resolution).…”
Section: Stellar Windsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This limits the ability of SPH to capture the low but continuous mass-loss rate from massive stars, unless the mass resolution is very much better than in our whole galaxy simulations (see e.g. Dale et al 2013). In other words, it is much more difficult to obtain a resolved and converged evolution of stellar winds using SPH as opposed to in an Eulerian grid-based code that in principle has infinite mass resolution (albeit coupled with finite spatial resolution).…”
Section: Stellar Windsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Dale et al (2012Dale et al ( , 2013 did extensive three-dimensional simulations of star cluster formation with ionization or stellar wind feedback and showed that the effects of photoionization and stellar winds are limited in quenching the star formation in massive molecular clouds (see also Walch et al 2012). Diaz-Miller et al (1998) calculated the steady-state structures of HII regions and pointed out that the photodissociation of hydrogen molecules due to far-ultraviolet (FUV) photons is much more important than photoionization due to UV photons for the destruction of molecular clouds.…”
Section: Quenching Of Star Formation In Molecular Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To have a fully physical description of a realistic selfregulation of star mass accretion and cluster formation, stellar feedbacks such as radiations (Bate 2009(Bate , 2012Price & Bate 2009;Commerçon et al 2011;Krumholz et al 2012), protostellar jets and outflows (Wang et al 2010;Nakamura & Li 2011Dale et al 2013cDale et al , 2015Federrath et al 2014;Federrath 2015), HII regions (Krumholz et al 2007;Peters et al 2010;Dale et al 2013aDale et al ,b, 2015Geen et al 2015), and supernovae (Iffrig & Hennebelle 2015;Walch & Naab 2015) should be incorporated. We limit ourselves to the simple scenario without feedback mechanisms, in which nothing except the depletion of cloud gas can stop sink accretion.…”
Section: Qualitative Presentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%