2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive star formation in Wolf-Rayet galaxies

Abstract: Aims. We have performed a comprehensive multiwavelength analysis of a sample of 20 starburst galaxies that show the presence of a substantial population of very young massive stars, most of them classified as Wolf-Rayet (WR) galaxies. In this paper, the second of the series, we present the results of the analysis of long-slit intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of star-formation bursts for 16 galaxies of our sample. Methods. We study the spatial localization of the WR stars in each galaxy. We analyze the exci… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
67
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(188 reference statements)
6
67
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cairós et al 2001a,b;Bergvall & Östlin 2002;Papaderos et al 2006;Amorín et al 2009). However, as we previously said (López-Sánchez et al 2004a), this seems not to be true in the particular case of members F of HCG 31, which clearly show no evidences of underlying old stellar populations. This was recently confirmed by deep Hubble Space Telescope imaging (Gallagher et al 2010), and hence these two objects are very likely experiencing their very first star-formation event.…”
Section: Global Analysis Of Magnitudes and Coloursmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Cairós et al 2001a,b;Bergvall & Östlin 2002;Papaderos et al 2006;Amorín et al 2009). However, as we previously said (López-Sánchez et al 2004a), this seems not to be true in the particular case of members F of HCG 31, which clearly show no evidences of underlying old stellar populations. This was recently confirmed by deep Hubble Space Telescope imaging (Gallagher et al 2010), and hence these two objects are very likely experiencing their very first star-formation event.…”
Section: Global Analysis Of Magnitudes and Coloursmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Table 1 also lists some tidal dwarf galaxy (TDG) candidates (HCG 31 E, F1 and F2;Mkn 1087 #1 and #3, POX 4 Comp) and nearby external objects (Mkn 1087 N, Mkn 1199 NE, IRAS 08309+6517 C, Tol 1457-262 #15 and #16) surrounding a main galaxy. However, as we remarked in Paper I and in the analysis of the HCG 31 members (López-Sánchez et al 2004a), we must keep in mind that the B-magnitude of a starburst is increased by several magnitudes during the first 10 Myr with respect to its brightness in the quiescent phase, so we should expect that some of the objects with −18 ≥ M B ≥ −19.5 are indeed defined as dwarf objects during their quiescent phase.…”
Section: Global Analysis Of Magnitudes and Coloursmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We tried to find these features in the spectra of the complexes, but could find no clear evidence of these bumps. This bump is much more difficult to detect than the other bump (such as the blue bump) characteristic of WRs because it is always weaker (e.g., Fernandes et al 2004;López-Sánchez & Esteban 2009). Sometimes it is not even detected again in Wolf-Rayet galaxies where it was previously seen (López-Sánchez & Esteban 2009).…”
Section: Age and Mass Estimates Of The Young Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%