2018
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2018.2790912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Massive MIMO Performance—TDD Versus FDD: What Do Measurements Say?

Abstract: Abstract-Downlink beamforming in Massive MIMO either relies on uplink pilot measurements-exploiting reciprocity and time-division duplexing (TDD) operation, or on the use of a predetermined grid of beams with user equipments reporting their preferred beams, mostly in frequency-division duplexing (FDD) operation. Massive MIMO in its originally conceived form uses the first strategy, with uplink pilots, whereas there is currently significant commercial interest in the second, gridof-beams. It has been analytical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analytical and numerical results illustrated that mmWave multi-user (MU) channel estimation at the BS in uplink outperforms downlink channel estimation at the users for a fixed overhead, even if the required signalling overhead feedback is not taken into account [39]. The results hold for both fully digital and hybrid architectures at the receiver and transmitter sides and have been verified via the recent field test [43]. Besides, the algorithm mentioned above can work well in sparse and nonsparse environments 5 [2].…”
Section: A Pilot Contamination In Mmwave Systemsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The analytical and numerical results illustrated that mmWave multi-user (MU) channel estimation at the BS in uplink outperforms downlink channel estimation at the users for a fixed overhead, even if the required signalling overhead feedback is not taken into account [39]. The results hold for both fully digital and hybrid architectures at the receiver and transmitter sides and have been verified via the recent field test [43]. Besides, the algorithm mentioned above can work well in sparse and nonsparse environments 5 [2].…”
Section: A Pilot Contamination In Mmwave Systemsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) will be an essential part of 5G and beyond wireless communications systems. While massive MIMO performs generally better using time division duplex (TDD) than frequency division duplex (FDD) [1], frequency regulators over the world have assigned large swathes of valuable spectrum as band pairs for FDD operation; furthermore backward compatibility considerations (e.g., with Long-Term Evolution (LTE)) also often require FDD operation. Enabling FDD massive MIMO has thus been a popular research topic in recent years [2]- [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors are with Communication Systems Department, EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech, 06410 Biot, France (e-mail: xiwen.jiang@eurecom.fr; florian.kaltenberger@eurecom.fr). system [4], but are clearly suboptimal compared to the case where full channel state information at the transmitter (CSIT) is available [5]. Under the assumption of full CSIT, a hybrid massive MIMO system can achieve the same performance of any fully digital beamforming scheme, as long as the number of RF chains is at least twice the number of data schemes [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%